FigJam vs Miro: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of FigJam and Miro to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
FigJam
6.8/10
FigJam is Figma's online whiteboard for team brainstorming, diagramming, workshops and lightweight project planning, sold through Figma seats.
Miro
7/10
Miro is a visual collaboration workspace with an infinite whiteboard, docs, tables, and Kanban boards, which teams use to plan projects, run workshops, and map workflows.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.8/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 2/10 | 4/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | $3/user/mo Professional (Collab seat) | $10/user/mo Starter |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Starter | Free Free |
| Features | ||
| Client collaboration | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Timeline view | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | Not listed | |
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Whiteboards | ||
| Docs | Not listed | |
| Spreadsheet interface | Not listed | |
| Kanban boards | Not listed | |
FigJam vs Miro cost by team size
FigJam and Miro cost the same at every team size we checked.
| Team size | FigJam | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeStarter | FreeFree |
| 5 users | FreeStarter | FreeFree |
| 10 users | FreeStarter | FreeFree |
| 25 users | FreeStarter | FreeFree |
| 50 users | FreeStarter | FreeFree |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose FigJam
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (9/10 vs 8/10)
Why choose Miro
- Higher Analytics score (4/10 vs 2/10)
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for consultancies (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
FigJam
Pros
- Most teams pick it up quickly, and reviewers on Capterra and G2 (4.6/5) praise how easy it is to learn
- More than 300 templates for retros, standups, kickoffs and Gantt-style plans cut setup time
- External guests can join free for 24 hours without logging in
- The Collab seat costs only $3 to $5 per user per month
- AI can generate diagrams and templates, cluster stickies and summarize sessions into action items
Cons
- It is not a full project management tool: it has no dashboards, reporting, time tracking or workflow automation
- Reviewers report limited export options
- Performance can slow down on large boards
- It has no offline mode
- Seats are tied to Figma licensing, so the overall pricing structure is complex
Miro
Pros
- Real-time collaboration on an infinite canvas, with many templates for workshops, roadmaps, and diagrams.
- Reviewers say teammates with little project-management experience pick up the basics quickly.
- Business includes two-way sync with Jira, Asana, Linear, ClickUp, and Azure DevOps.
- Strong security credentials, including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, SSO, and data residency on Enterprise.
- Free plan allows unlimited members, and Starter costs $8 per member per month on annual billing.
Cons
- Very large boards can feel cluttered and hard to navigate.
- Advanced workflows, integrations, and automation take time to learn.
- Sonary rates support at 2.5 out of 5, and 24/7 support is a paid Enterprise add-on.
- It does not work offline.
- It lacks the deep task tracking and reporting of a dedicated project management tool, so it is often used alongside one.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Miro scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7/10 against 6.8/10 for FigJam. The largest gap is in Analytics: 2/10 for FigJam and 4/10 for Miro.
Both are free for 10 users.
Yes, both FigJam and Miro have a free plan.
Miro is the better fit for consultancies: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for FigJam.
