Baserow vs Miro Comparison
Compare Baserow vs Miro features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Baserow
6.9/10
Open-source no-code database and application builder that teams use to manage projects, data, and workflows, available in the cloud or self-hosted.
Miro
7/10
Miro is a visual collaboration workspace with an infinite whiteboard, docs, tables, and Kanban boards, which teams use to plan projects, run workshops, and map workflows.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.9/10 | 7/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | $12/user/mo Premium | $10/user/mo Starter |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free | Free Free |
| Features | ||
| Scheduling | Not listed | |
| Databases | Not listed | |
| Spreadsheet interface | ||
| Client collaboration | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Timeline view | Not listed | |
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Workflow Automation | Not listed | |
| Dashboards | Not listed | |
| Kanban boards | ||
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Docs | Not listed | |
| Whiteboards | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Baserow
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Analytics score (5/10 vs 4/10)
Why choose Miro
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for agencies (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (8/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Baserow
Pros
- Open-source self-hosted edition has no row, storage, or API caps, which suits teams that need data sovereignty.
- Paid seats cost about half as much as Airtable seats, starting at $10 per user per month on annual billing.
- Native Airtable import and a familiar grid interface make it easier for Airtable users to switch.
- Built-in application builder can turn databases into client portals with up to 500 external users.
- Open REST API, an MCP server, and connectors for Zapier, Make, and n8n.
Cons
- Kanban, calendar, and timeline views require a paid plan, even when self-hosted.
- No native iOS or Android apps, and reviewers report poor mobile and embed compatibility.
- Viewer roles, data sync, and direct support only start at the Advanced tier.
- Automation builder is still in beta, and the integration ecosystem is smaller than Airtable's.
- Reviewers note fewer templates and possible performance issues with very large databases.
Miro
Pros
- Real-time collaboration on an infinite canvas, with many templates for workshops, roadmaps, and diagrams.
- Reviewers say teammates with little project-management experience pick up the basics quickly.
- Business includes two-way sync with Jira, Asana, Linear, ClickUp, and Azure DevOps.
- Strong security credentials, including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, SSO, and data residency on Enterprise.
- Free plan allows unlimited members, and Starter costs $8 per member per month on annual billing.
Cons
- Very large boards can feel cluttered and hard to navigate.
- Advanced workflows, integrations, and automation take time to learn.
- Sonary rates support at 2.5 out of 5, and 24/7 support is a paid Enterprise add-on.
- It does not work offline.
- It lacks the deep task tracking and reporting of a dedicated project management tool, so it is often used alongside one.
