Fibery vs Lark Comparison
Compare Fibery vs Lark features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026

Fibery
6.8/10
Fibery is a configurable work and knowledge management platform where startups and product teams build linked databases, docs, whiteboards, and project views.

Lark
6.4/10
Lark is ByteDance's all-in-one workplace suite. It combines chat, video meetings, docs, wikis and the Base database for project tracking and workflow automation.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.8/10 | 6.4/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | €12/user/mo Standard | $6/user/mo Basic |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free | Free Starter |
| Features | ||
| Team messaging | ||
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Dashboards | ||
| Databases | ||
| Docs | ||
| Gantt charts | ||
| Kanban boards | ||
| Knowledge base | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| Spreadsheet interface | ||
| Task management | ||
| Timeline view | ||
| Workflow automation | ||
| App integrations | Not listed | |
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| File sharing | Not listed | |
| Reporting | Not listed | |
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Whiteboards | Not listed | |
Fibery vs Lark cost by team size
| Team size | Fibery | Lark |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree | FreeStarter |
| 5 users | FreeFree | FreeStarter |
| 10 users | FreeFree | FreeStarter |
| 25 users | €1,000/moEnterprise | $150/moBasic |
| 50 users | €2,000/moEnterprise | $300/moBasic |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Fibery

- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 7/10)
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for product teams (9/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Lark

- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Includes Team messaging, which Fibery lacks
Pros & Cons
Fibery

Pros
- Users define their own databases and relations, so a single workspace can replace separate tools for feedback, roadmaps, and wikis.
- Observers and guests are free on every plan, so stakeholders can view and comment without adding paid seats.
- Nine view types, including Gantt with dependencies, Timeline, Calendar, and Map, are built in.
- Reviewers on G2 and Capterra describe support as responsive and hands-on, including help with complex setups.
- Every plan includes AI features and an MCP server, and the vendor says customer data is not used to train AI models.
Cons
- Reviewers most often complain about the steep learning curve, especially for non-technical teammates.
- Teams must model their processes before tracking feels natural, which adds setup overhead.
- Reviewers describe dashboards and charts as less polished than in dedicated tools, and portfolio resource planning is limited.
- SSO and SCIM are available only on Enterprise, which requires at least 25 paid seats.
- Fibery does not list native time tracking or team chat on its features page.
Lark

Pros
- Combines chat, video meetings, docs, wikis and project databases in one app, so teams switch between tools less often.
- The free Starter plan supports up to 20 users with 100GB of storage, which is generous for small teams.
- Lark Base offers kanban, Gantt and calendar views, dashboards and automations for flexible project tracking.
- Built-in AI translation and timezone tools help distributed and multilingual teams.
- Paid plans start at around $6 to $12 per user per month on annual billing, which can cost less than paying for several separate tools.
Cons
- Banned in the United States since January 2025 along with other ByteDance apps.
- Fewer third-party integrations than Slack or Microsoft 365, according to reviewers.
- The broad feature set takes training to learn, and some reviewers find the chat interface cramped.
- Some users report dropped audio and video calls and a sidebar layout that cannot be changed.
- Enterprise pricing is not published.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Fibery scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.4/10 for Lark. The largest gap is in Customization: 9/10 for Fibery and 7/10 for Lark.
Yes, both Fibery and Lark have a free plan.
Fibery is the better fit for product teams: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 6/10 for Lark.
Lark has Team messaging, which Fibery lacks.





