Everhour vs SeaTable: Complete Comparison (2026)

Why choose Everhour

• Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10)
• Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)

Why choose SeaTable

• Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Security score (8/10 vs 5/10)
• Better fit for enterprise (6/10 vs 4/10)

Everhour

Pros

• More than 20 native integrations, including Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Jira and Linear, put a timer directly on tasks, and reviewers praise these integrations most.
• A browser extension adds tracking to more than 20 other web apps, such as Figma, HubSpot and Zendesk.
• Budgets with alerts, expense tracking and invoicing that syncs to QuickBooks, Xero or FreshBooks cover billable work end to end.
• The Team plan costs 8.50 USD per seat per month on yearly billing, and the free plan covers up to 5 seats.
• Reviewers often single out the customer support, and Everhour holds about a 4.8 out of 5 average across 139 SpotSaaS ratings.

Cons

• It is not a standalone PM suite: it has no Gantt charts, docs or whiteboards.
• The free plan has no integrations, which are the product's main value.
• Paid plans require 5 seats and payment by card only, and unused time is not refunded when you cancel.
• Its security documentation relies on AWS's SOC 2 compliance rather than its own report, and it does not run formal periodic risk assessments.
• Some users report hours that failed to record, too many reminder alerts, and limited chart-style reporting.

SeaTable

Pros

• Can be self-hosted with Docker, with a free edition for 3 users, so organisations keep full control of their data.
• The cloud runs in German data centres and the company is EU-based, which reviewers say makes GDPR compliance easier.
• The free plan allows up to 25 users and 10,000 rows, which is generous compared with many spreadsheet-database tools.
• Kanban, Gantt, calendar and timeline plugins plus Python and JavaScript scripting allow flexible project workflows.
• Nonprofits and educational institutions get 50% off.

Cons

• Reviewers report a steep learning curve for new users.
• Reviewers say the API lacks features needed to use SeaTable as a backend for low-code apps.
• Many plan limits are metered per user, including API calls, automations and AI credits.
• A reviewer called the price jump from 25 to 50 self-hosted users steep, and individual views cannot be shared on the free cloud plan.
• It is a database builder, so there is no built-in time tracking, chat or docs for project management.