E2E Networks vs UpCloud Comparison
Compare E2E Networks vs UpCloud features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026

E2E Networks
6.1/10
Indian, NSE-listed cloud provider offering NVIDIA GPU cloud, CPU virtual machines, managed Kubernetes, databases, object storage and CDN for AI teams and developers.

UpCloud
7/10
A Finnish cloud infrastructure provider offering cloud servers, managed Kubernetes, managed databases, object storage, and networking to developers and businesses.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.1/10 | 7/10 |
| Integration | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $10/mo Object Storage | €3/mo Starter |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $10/mo Object Storage | €3/mo Starter |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Content Delivery Network | ||
| Managed Databases | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Object Storage | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
E2E Networks vs UpCloud cost by team size
| Team size | E2E Networks | UpCloud |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $10/moObject Storage | €3/moStarter |
| 5 users | $10/moObject Storage | €3/moStarter |
| 10 users | $10/moObject Storage | €3/moStarter |
| 25 users | $10/moObject Storage | €3/moStarter |
| 50 users | $10/moObject Storage | €3/moStarter |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose E2E Networks

- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose UpCloud

- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
E2E Networks

Pros
- GPU-hour rates such as $0.45 for a T4 and $3.99 for an H100 are low compared with the hyperscalers.
- Indian data centers suit buyers that need data to stay in India.
- Broad NVIDIA lineup, from T4 to B200, plus the TIR platform for training and inference.
- G2 reviewers praise the cost-effectiveness and how easy it is to get started.
Cons
- Instances are self-managed, so customers handle their own OS, backups and middleware.
- Few regions, all in India, and Mumbai has been discontinued for some services.
- According to a competitor's analysis, the SLA is 99.9 percent and disaster recovery is manual, active-passive failover.
- GPU, storage and CPU prices changed in mid-2026, according to a competitor's analysis.
UpCloud

Pros
- Independent benchmarks recorded very low p99 disk latency on its MaxIOPS storage
- Advertises a 100% uptime SLA with 50x credits for downtime
- Fixed plan prices include data transfer, which keeps bills predictable
- Official Terraform provider, REST API, and CLI support infrastructure as code
- Broad managed portfolio covering Kubernetes, four database engines, object storage, and a CDN
- EU headquarters, ISO 27001 certification, and GDPR focus suit European buyers
Cons
- Reviewers find it several times more expensive than Hetzner for similar specs
- Fewer locations than larger providers, concentrated in Europe
- Smaller community and fewer third-party reviews than DigitalOcean or Vultr
- One user reports outbound port 25 is blocked by default, which hinders mail servers
- Pricing is changing in November 2026, so older published prices may be out of date
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
UpCloud scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7/10 against 6.1/10 for E2E Networks. The largest gap is in Support: 5/10 for E2E Networks and 8/10 for UpCloud.
No, neither E2E Networks nor UpCloud lists a free plan.
UpCloud is the better fit for developers: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for E2E Networks.





