b stack radar

Cresta vs Fin Comparison

Compare Cresta vs Fin features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

Cresta logo

Cresta

6.8/10

Cresta is an enterprise contact center AI platform that provides autonomous AI agents, real-time agent assist, conversation intelligence and automated quality management.

Fin logo

Fin

7.4/10

Winner

Fin is Intercom's AI customer service agent. It resolves support conversations across chat, email, voice and social, either inside Intercom or on top of an existing helpdesk.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Cresta logo
Cresta
Fin logo
Fin
Scores
Overall Rating6.8/107.4/10
Integration7/108/10
Analytics9/108/10
Customization8/108/10
Ease of Use6/107/10
Support6/105/10
Cost3/104/10
Scalability9/109/10
Security9/109/10
Output Quality7/109/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricing$19/user/mo
Fin with Intercom
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingContact for pricing
Features
AI Agents
Chatbots
Data Analysis
Knowledge Base Search
Voice and Audio
Workflow Automation
API AccessNot listed
Custom Model TrainingNot listed
Enterprise ControlsNot listed
Text GenerationNot listed
TranscriptionNot listed

Which One Should You Choose?

Cresta logo
Why choose Cresta

  • Higher Analytics score (9/10 vs 8/10)
  • Higher Support score (6/10 vs 5/10)

Fin logo
Why choose Fin

  • Higher Output Quality score (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 7/10)
  • Better fit for startups (7/10 vs 1/10)
  • Better fit for mid-market (9/10 vs 4/10)

Pros & Cons

Cresta logo
Cresta

Pros

  • Gives agents real-time guidance and knowledge answers during live calls and chats, which G2 reviewers single out as a strength.
  • Scores and analyses every conversation automatically instead of a manual sample.
  • Models are trained on the customer's own conversation data, so guidance reflects the company's own top performers.
  • Unusually broad compliance coverage, including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI-DSS, HIPAA and ISO/IEC 42001.

Cons

  • No public pricing, free tier or self-serve trial; buying requires a sales cycle and usually a paid pilot.
  • Model training and tuning can take months before the value shows.
  • A few G2 reviewers report inaccurate AI suggestions or poor understanding of conversations.
  • Generally economical only for contact centers with about 100 or more agents.

Fin logo
Fin

Pros

  • Intercom reports a 76% average resolution rate across more than 12,000 customers, and G2 reviewers praise how quick and human-sounding its answers are.
  • It runs on existing helpdesks such as Zendesk, Salesforce, HubSpot and Freshdesk, so teams do not have to move to Intercom.
  • Its compliance list is broad: SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 27701 and HIPAA, plus SSO, SCIM and data hosting in the US, EU or Australia.
  • Simulations and regression tests let teams check configuration changes before they go live.
  • There are no setup or platform fees, and the 14-day trial needs no credit card.

Cons

  • Per-outcome billing makes monthly costs hard to predict, and G2 reviewers report unexpected bills during volume spikes.
  • Inside Intercom, the per-seat helpdesk fees come on top of the outcome charges.
  • Fin can pull the wrong article when knowledge base topics overlap, so answer quality depends on well-kept help content.
  • A competitor's review says advanced Procedures and data connectors can take weeks to set up and may need technical skills.
  • Some reviewers complain about the responsiveness of Intercom's own customer support.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Fin scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.4/10 against 6.8/10 for Cresta. The largest gap is in Output Quality: 7/10 for Cresta and 9/10 for Fin.

No, neither Cresta nor Fin lists a free plan.

Fin is the better fit for startups: we rate it 7/10 for them, against 1/10 for Cresta.

Related Comparisons