Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Atlantic.Net Comparison
Compare Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Atlantic.Net features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
7.9/10
Amazon's public cloud platform, with over 200 pay-as-you-go services for compute, storage, databases, networking and AI, used by startups through large enterprises and governments.

Atlantic.Net
6.4/10
Atlantic.Net offers cloud VPS, dedicated servers and HIPAA-compliant managed hosting. It suits businesses that need audited, compliance-ready infrastructure in US, UK, Canadian and Singapore data centers.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.9/10 | 6.4/10 |
| Integration | 10/10 | 4/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 10/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 8/10 | 4/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $10/mo General Purpose G3.2GB (Linux) |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free plan | $10/mo General Purpose G3.2GB (Linux) |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| VPS Hosting | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Atlantic.Net cost by team size
Amazon Web Services (AWS) costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Atlantic.Net |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree plan | $10/moGeneral Purpose G3.2GB (Linux) |
| 5 users | FreeFree plan | $10/moGeneral Purpose G3.2GB (Linux) |
| 10 users | FreeFree plan | $10/moGeneral Purpose G3.2GB (Linux) |
| 25 users | FreeFree plan | $10/moGeneral Purpose G3.2GB (Linux) |
| 50 users | FreeFree plan | $10/moGeneral Purpose G3.2GB (Linux) |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Amazon Web Services (AWS)

- Has a free plan (Atlantic.Net does not)
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $10/mo
- Higher Integration score (10/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for saas companies (9/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Atlantic.Net

- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Support score (7/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Pros
- The service catalogue is unusually broad, with over 200 services across 38 regions, so most infrastructure needs can be met on one platform.
- EC2 has a 99.99% region-level SLA with credits of up to 100%, and instances unavailable for more than six minutes in an hour are not billed for that hour.
- The free plan gives up to $200 in credits, and more than 30 always-free services let new teams experiment at low cost.
- Support scales from a $29 minimum up to dedicated Enterprise and Unified Operations tiers for mission-critical workloads.
- G2 rates it 4.4 across more than 17,000 reviews, and reviewers praise its scalability and global reach.
Cons
- Reviewers widely cite a steep learning curve across the console and services.
- Usage pricing is complex and can produce unexpected bills unless spend is monitored closely.
- Paid support is billed as a percentage of total AWS spend, so support costs rise with usage.
- A July 2025 billing console bug showed customers estimated charges in the billions, which hurt trust in its cost tooling.
Atlantic.Net

Pros
- HIPAA hosting comes with a Business Associate Agreement as standard, backed by SOC 2, SOC 3, HIPAA and HITECH audits.
- Cloud servers are billed hourly, and entry Linux VPS plans start at $10 a month.
- One-year and three-year commitments cut optimized-plan prices by up to about two thirds.
- The SLA promises 100% availability for network, hardware and infrastructure.
- Wide OS choice: more than 40 Linux builds, 14 Windows Server versions and FreeBSD.
Cons
- Standard cloud plans do not include HIPAA compliance, so you need the more expensive HIPAA plans.
- Stopped servers keep billing until you delete them.
- No managed Kubernetes, serverless, managed database or object storage products are advertised.
- Dedicated server base prices are quote-only, and the setup fee terms on the page are unclear.
- The full BAA text is not published, so you must request it from sales to see exclusions.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon Web Services (AWS) scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 6.4/10 for Atlantic.Net. The largest gap is in Integration: 10/10 for Amazon Web Services (AWS) and 4/10 for Atlantic.Net.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) costs less for 10 users: free on its Free plan, against about $10/mo on its General Purpose G3.2GB (Linux) plan for Atlantic.Net, billed monthly.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) has a free plan; Atlantic.Net does not list one.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the better fit for saas companies: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for Atlantic.Net.




