Langdock vs Quiq: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Langdock and Quiq to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Langdock
7.1/10
Langdock is a Berlin-based, EU-hosted AI workspace where company teams chat with many AI models, build custom agents, and automate workflows under central governance.
Quiq
6.9/10
Quiq is an agentic AI customer experience platform. Enterprises use it to build governed AI agents for chat, messaging and voice, alongside a digital contact center for human agents.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.1/10 | 6.9/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Output Quality | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | €23/user/mo Core | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | €232/mo Core | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| AI Agents | ||
| API Access | ||
| Chatbots | ||
| Enterprise Controls | ||
| Knowledge Base Search | ||
| Workflow Automation | ||
| Data Analysis | Not listed | |
| Private Deployment | Not listed | |
| Text Generation | Not listed | |
| Transcription | Not listed | |
| Voice and Audio | Not listed | |
Langdock vs Quiq cost by team size
| Team size | Langdock | Quiq |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | €23/moCore | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | €116/moCore | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | €232/moCore | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | €580/moCore | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | €1,160/moCore | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Langdock
- Higher Cost score (5/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Security score (9/10 vs 8/10)
- Better fit for freelancers (3/10 vs 1/10)
- Better fit for mid-market (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Quiq
- Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Langdock
Pros
- Access to 40+ models from several providers in one interface, so teams can switch models without buying separate ChatGPT and Claude licences.
- Strong EU compliance posture: ISO 27001 certification, a SOC 2 Type II audit, GDPR compliance and EU hosting on Azure.
- SSO, SCIM and SAML are included even on the entry Core plan.
- Non-technical staff can build no-code agents with their own knowledge bases and permissions.
- Deployment options range from multi-tenant SaaS to single-tenant, bring-your-own-cloud and on-premise Kubernetes.
Cons
- There is no permanent free tier, only a 7-day trial.
- Dedicated and on-premise deployments require 2,000 to 5,000+ seats.
- Reviewers say its workflows still leave many actions to humans, so automation of operational tasks is limited.
- Building advanced agents has a learning curve.
- Per-seat pricing with Max seat upgrades and workflow add-ons can get expensive for small teams.
Quiq
Pros
- Pricing is per conversation, so large human-agent teams do not pay seat fees for the AI tooling.
- AI Studio supports no-code, low-code and full-code building, includes a turn-by-turn test console, and is model-agnostic.
- Governance features such as claim verification, decision logs and guardrails suit regulated industries.
- Listed compliance includes SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR and CCPA, and Quiq claims 99.999% uptime.
- Reviewers on G2 and Software Advice rate it around 4.5 to 4.6 and praise the admin interface.
Cons
- There is no public price list or self-serve plan, and third-party price estimates vary widely.
- Review volume is small, so independent evidence on the newer agentic and voice features is limited.
- One reviewer asked for reporting that combines email and text channels.
- Google's shutdown of Business Messages removed a rich messaging channel some customers relied on.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Langdock scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.1/10 against 6.9/10 for Quiq. The largest gap is in Analytics: 6/10 for Langdock and 7/10 for Quiq.
No, neither Langdock nor Quiq lists a free plan.
Langdock is the better fit for developers: we rate it 6/10 for them, against 4/10 for Quiq.
