Jira vs Planview AdaptiveWork Comparison
Compare Jira vs Planview AdaptiveWork features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Jira
7.3/10
Atlassian's work and issue-tracking platform for planning, tracking, and shipping projects, with scrum and kanban boards built mainly for software and technical teams.
Planview AdaptiveWork
6.6/10
Enterprise project and portfolio management platform, formerly Clarizen, for PMOs and professional services teams that need resource, financial and portfolio control.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.3/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Cost | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| Ease of Use | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Scalability | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Integration | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $8/user/mo Standard | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Dashboards | ||
| Kanban boards | ||
| Reporting | ||
| Task lists | ||
| Task management | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Timeline view | ||
| Workflow automation | ||
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| File sharing | Not listed | |
| Gantt charts | Not listed | |
| Goals and OKRs | Not listed | |
Jira vs Planview AdaptiveWork cost by team size
| Team size | Jira | Planview AdaptiveWork |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | $212/moStandard | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | $424/moStandard | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Jira
- Has a free plan (Planview AdaptiveWork does not)
- Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Support score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 2/10)
- Better fit for small business (6/10 vs 3/10)
Why choose Planview AdaptiveWork
- Higher Ease of Use score (5/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Jira
Pros
- The free plan supports up to 10 users and includes scrum and kanban boards.
- Reviewers highlight deep customization of workflows, boards, and fields.
- Sprint and agile management are strong, and Jira integrates with GitHub and Git tools.
- It links closely with Confluence and other Atlassian products, so tickets can be referenced across those apps.
- Time tracking is built into every plan, including Free.
Cons
- Reviewers report a steep learning curve and an interface that overwhelms non-technical users.
- Users report slow issue loading and laggy boards in large deployments.
- Paid Marketplace apps can add hidden costs for reporting, CRM, and helpdesk needs.
- The free plan is limited to 100 emails per day and community support only.
- Troubleshooting failed automation rules can be frustrating.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Pros
- Deep customization, including custom objects and fields, dependent picklists and custom workflow actions.
- Reviewers single out reporting as a strength, and Slide Publisher automates PowerPoint status decks.
- Professional services financials, including rate cards, billable time, utilization and revenue forecasting, are built in.
- An External Collaborator portal gives clients access to projects, files and requests.
- It has a broad set of enterprise connectors, including Jira, Salesforce, ServiceNow, SAP and Microsoft Teams.
Cons
- No public pricing, and reviewers frequently call it expensive compared with similar tools.
- There is a steep learning curve, and some users find it overwhelming at first.
- Heavy customization can slow performance, especially over a VPN.
- Reviewers report mixed support, with slower resolution of complex issues.
- There is no separate development environment for testing workflows against live data.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Jira scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 7.3/10 against 6.6/10 for Planview AdaptiveWork. The largest gap is in Cost: 7/10 for Jira and 3/10 for Planview AdaptiveWork.
Jira has a free plan; Planview AdaptiveWork does not list one.
Jira is the better fit for startups: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 2/10 for Planview AdaptiveWork.
