b stack radar

Google Sheets vs Miro: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of Google Sheets and Miro to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

Google Sheets logo

Google Sheets

7.2/10

Winner

Google Sheets is a browser-based spreadsheet in Google Workspace that teams can edit together and often use to track simple projects and tasks.

Miro logo

Miro

7/10

Miro is a visual collaboration workspace with an infinite whiteboard, docs, tables, and Kanban boards, which teams use to plan projects, run workshops, and map workflows.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Google Sheets logo
Google Sheets
Miro logo
Miro
Scores
Overall Rating7.2/107/10
Analytics6/104/10
Cost9/106/10
Customization8/107/10
Ease of Use8/108/10
Integration7/108/10
Scalability4/108/10
Security7/109/10
Support5/105/10
Pricing
Free planNoYes
Cheapest paid plan€7/user/mo
Business Starter
$10/user/mo
Starter
Estimated cost for 10 users€211/mo
Business Plus
Free
Free
Features
Spreadsheet interface
File sharingNot listed
Client collaboration
App integrations
Task listsNot listed
Gantt chartsNot listed
Timeline viewNot listed
Time trackingNot listed
Workflow AutomationNot listed
Kanban boards
Collaboration tools
DocsNot listed
WhiteboardsNot listed

Which One Should You Choose?

Google Sheets logo
Why choose Google Sheets

  • Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Analytics score (6/10 vs 4/10)

Miro logo
Why choose Miro

  • Has a free plan (Google Sheets does not)
  • Higher Scalability score (8/10 vs 4/10)
  • Higher Security score (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Better fit for enterprise (8/10 vs 4/10)
  • Includes Kanban boards, which Google Sheets lacks

Pros & Cons

Google Sheets logo
Google Sheets

Pros

  • Real-time co-editing, comments and version history make it easy for a team to share one tracker.
  • Prebuilt project management and event-planning templates mean teams do not have to build a tracker from scratch.
  • There is no extra cost for organisations that already pay for Google Workspace seats.
  • Connected Sheets can analyse BigQuery or Looker data with billions of rows directly in a spreadsheet.
  • On higher Workspace tiers, Gemini can create trackers and write formulas from plain-language prompts.

Cons

  • It has no native Gantt charts, task dependencies or time tracking for real project scheduling.
  • Missed deadlines do not trigger automatic alerts, so team members have to be notified by hand.
  • Large or complex shared sheets slow down and are easy to break when several people edit at once.
  • Timeline view is limited to certain paid Workspace editions.
  • Dashboards and reporting have to be built by hand or added with add-ons.

Miro logo
Miro

Pros

  • Real-time collaboration on an infinite canvas, with many templates for workshops, roadmaps, and diagrams.
  • Reviewers say teammates with little project-management experience pick up the basics quickly.
  • Business includes two-way sync with Jira, Asana, Linear, ClickUp, and Azure DevOps.
  • Strong security credentials, including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, SSO, and data residency on Enterprise.
  • Free plan allows unlimited members, and Starter costs $8 per member per month on annual billing.

Cons

  • Very large boards can feel cluttered and hard to navigate.
  • Advanced workflows, integrations, and automation take time to learn.
  • Sonary rates support at 2.5 out of 5, and 24/7 support is a paid Enterprise add-on.
  • It does not work offline.
  • It lacks the deep task tracking and reporting of a dedicated project management tool, so it is often used alongside one.

Not sold on either?

Related Comparisons