Everhour vs HaloPSA Comparison

Why choose Everhour

• Has a free plan (HaloPSA does not)
• Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 5/10)
• Better fit for freelancers (5/10 vs 2/10)
• Better fit for startups (7/10 vs 4/10)

Why choose HaloPSA

• Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Security score (9/10 vs 5/10)
• Better fit for enterprise (7/10 vs 4/10)
• Better fit for mid-market (8/10 vs 6/10)

Everhour

Pros

• More than 20 native integrations, including Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Jira and Linear, put a timer directly on tasks, and reviewers praise these integrations most.
• A browser extension adds tracking to more than 20 other web apps, such as Figma, HubSpot and Zendesk.
• Budgets with alerts, expense tracking and invoicing that syncs to QuickBooks, Xero or FreshBooks cover billable work end to end.
• The Team plan costs 8.50 USD per seat per month on yearly billing, and the free plan covers up to 5 seats.
• Reviewers often single out the customer support, and Everhour holds about a 4.8 out of 5 average across 139 SpotSaaS ratings.

Cons

• It is not a standalone PM suite: it has no Gantt charts, docs or whiteboards.
• The free plan has no integrations, which are the product's main value.
• Paid plans require 5 seats and payment by card only, and unused time is not refunded when you cancel.
• Its security documentation relies on AWS's SOC 2 compliance rather than its own report, and it does not run formal periodic risk assessments.
• Some users report hours that failed to record, too many reminder alerts, and limited chart-style reporting.

HaloPSA

Pros

• One per-agent plan includes every module and the AI features, with no paid add-ons.
• Portal customers and end users are free, so client collaboration does not add licence cost.
• More than 250 integrations, including accounting and RMM tools, are included at no extra charge.
• Broad compliance coverage includes ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP and HIPAA, plus SSO and audit logs.
• Reviewers describe the browser interface as modern and fast.

Cons

• Reviewers say the configuration menus are convoluted, and a consultant is often needed to get the most out of it.
• A paid onboarding package is mandatory and its price is not published.
• The project features are oriented toward IT service delivery rather than complex professional services projects.
• Some users report slowness and weaker calendar, notification and stock-control features.
• Per-agent costs add up for larger teams.