Everhour vs Grist: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Everhour and Grist to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Everhour
7.1/10
Everhour is a time tracking tool for teams and agencies that adds timers, budgets, resource planning and invoicing to existing project management apps.
Grist
6.8/10
Grist is an open-source relational spreadsheet-database with Python formulas, available as a cloud service or self-hosted, for teams building custom trackers and lightweight apps.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.1/10 | 6.8/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Security | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | $9/user/mo Team | $10/user/mo Pro |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $85/mo Team | Free Free |
| Features | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Dashboards | ||
| Reporting | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| Collaboration tools | Not listed | |
| Databases | Not listed | |
| File sharing | Not listed | |
| Spreadsheet interface | Not listed | |
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Time tracking | Not listed | |
| Timeline view | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | Not listed | |
Everhour vs Grist cost by team size
Everhour and Grist cost the same up to 5 users; Grist costs less from 10 to 25 users.
| Team size | Everhour | Grist |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree | FreeFree |
| 5 users | FreeFree | FreeFree |
| 10 users | $85/moTeam | FreeFree |
| 25 users | $213/moTeam | FreeSelf-hosted Community |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | FreeSelf-hosted Community |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Everhour
- Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Grist
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $85/mo
- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (6/10 vs 4/10)
Pros & Cons
Everhour
Pros
- More than 20 native integrations, including Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Jira and Linear, put a timer directly on tasks, and reviewers praise these integrations most.
- A browser extension adds tracking to more than 20 other web apps, such as Figma, HubSpot and Zendesk.
- Budgets with alerts, expense tracking and invoicing that syncs to QuickBooks, Xero or FreshBooks cover billable work end to end.
- The Team plan costs 8.50 USD per seat per month on yearly billing, and the free plan covers up to 5 seats.
- Reviewers often single out the customer support, and Everhour holds about a 4.8 out of 5 average across 139 SpotSaaS ratings.
Cons
- It is not a standalone PM suite: it has no Gantt charts, docs or whiteboards.
- The free plan has no integrations, which are the product's main value.
- Paid plans require 5 seats and payment by card only, and unused time is not refunded when you cancel.
- Its security documentation relies on AWS's SOC 2 compliance rather than its own report, and it does not run formal periodic risk assessments.
- Some users report hours that failed to record, too many reminder alerts, and limited chart-style reporting.
Grist
Pros
- Python formulas and relational references give more modelling power than ordinary spreadsheets.
- The open-source core can be self-hosted for free, which is useful for privacy-sensitive organisations.
- The free tier allows unlimited documents and up to 10 members.
- Linked widgets (table, card, chart, calendar, form, custom) let teams build tailored project apps.
- Reviewers praise the responsive support team and active community.
Cons
- There are no built-in Kanban or Gantt views, so project workflows must be assembled by hand.
- Per-document record caps (5,000 on Free, 150,000 on Business) limit large datasets.
- The company has acknowledged performance concerns with large databases.
- Automations require the $30-per-user Business plan, which has a five-user minimum.
- Few public reviews exist, and no compliance certifications are listed.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Everhour scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 7.1/10 against 6.8/10 for Grist. The largest gap is in Customization: 5/10 for Everhour and 9/10 for Grist.
Grist costs less for 10 users: free on its Free plan, against about $85/mo on its Team plan for Everhour, billed monthly.
Yes, both Everhour and Grist have a free plan.
Grist is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 6/10 for them, against 4/10 for Everhour.
