EspoCRM vs OroCRM Comparison
Compare EspoCRM vs OroCRM features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026

EspoCRM
6.9/10
Open-source CRM for small and mid-sized businesses that can be self-hosted free or bought as a per-user cloud subscription.

OroCRM
6/10
Open source CRM built on OroPlatform and Symfony. It manages leads, opportunities, accounts, cases and campaigns for mid-size and large businesses that need deep customization.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.9/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | €13/user/mo Basic | $116/user/mo Enterprise Edition |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Open Source (self-hosted) | Free Community Edition |
| Features | ||
| Marketing Automation | ||
| Built-in Calling | Not listed | |
| Collaboration | Not listed | |
| Customer Support Management | ||
| Lead Management | ||
| Integrations | ||
| Sales Automation | ||
| Opportunity Management | ||
| Contact Management | ||
| Reporting & Analytics | ||
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose EspoCRM

- Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for small business (9/10 vs 4/10)
Why choose OroCRM

- Higher Scalability score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (7/10 vs 4/10)
Pros & Cons
EspoCRM

Pros
- The Entity Manager lets administrators add custom entities, fields and relationships without writing code.
- Every cloud plan includes all official extensions at no extra cost, among them the Sales Pack, VoIP, Google, Outlook and Mailchimp.
- The free, self-hostable open-source core keeps costs very low for small teams.
- You own your database and files and can request copies, which limits lock-in.
- Hosting in Germany is available for teams that need GDPR-friendly data residency.
Cons
- Reviewers say the initial setup of entities, roles and automations takes time and some technical skill.
- G2 reviewers point to a steep learning curve and limited documentation.
- A few reviewers reported slower performance with large datasets.
- Cloud support runs only 12 hours a day, 5 days a week, and the vendor team is very small.
- Self-hosted users must pay for reporting and BPM through the Advanced Pack.
OroCRM

Pros
- The Community Edition is open source under OSL-3.0, so you can self-host it with no licence fees.
- The Symfony-based OroPlatform lets developers deeply customize entities, workflows and the user interface.
- A built-in workflow engine covers leads, opportunities and tasks, and teams can add custom workflows.
- Opportunities support multiple currencies, and Enterprise supports multiple organizations, which suits companies operating in several regions.
- Mailchimp, Dotdigital and Zendesk integrations are documented.
Cons
- Email campaigns depend on Mailchimp or Dotdigital, with no native email marketing engine.
- Self-hosting and customization need PHP and Symfony developers.
- Oro does not publish Enterprise pricing on its own site.
- There are very few independent user reviews, which makes it hard to judge vendor support.




