b stack radar

EspoCRM vs OroCRM Comparison

Compare EspoCRM vs OroCRM features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

EspoCRM logo

EspoCRM

6.9/10

Winner

Open-source CRM for small and mid-sized businesses that can be self-hosted free or bought as a per-user cloud subscription.

OroCRM logo

OroCRM

6/10

Open source CRM built on OroPlatform and Symfony. It manages leads, opportunities, accounts, cases and campaigns for mid-size and large businesses that need deep customization.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
EspoCRM logo
EspoCRM
OroCRM logo
OroCRM
Scores
Overall Rating6.9/106/10
Analytics6/106/10
Cost9/105/10
Customization9/109/10
Ease of Use6/104/10
Integration6/106/10
Scalability6/107/10
Security6/106/10
Support5/105/10
Pricing
Free planYesYes
Cheapest paid plan€13/user/mo
Basic
$116/user/mo
Enterprise Edition
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Open Source (self-hosted)
Free
Community Edition
Features
Marketing Automation
Built-in CallingNot listed
CollaborationNot listed
Customer Support Management
Lead Management
Integrations
Sales Automation
Opportunity Management
Contact Management
Reporting & Analytics

Which One Should You Choose?

EspoCRM logo
Why choose EspoCRM

  • Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 4/10)
  • Better fit for small business (9/10 vs 4/10)

OroCRM logo
Why choose OroCRM

  • Higher Scalability score (7/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for enterprise (7/10 vs 4/10)

Pros & Cons

EspoCRM logo
EspoCRM

Pros

  • The Entity Manager lets administrators add custom entities, fields and relationships without writing code.
  • Every cloud plan includes all official extensions at no extra cost, among them the Sales Pack, VoIP, Google, Outlook and Mailchimp.
  • The free, self-hostable open-source core keeps costs very low for small teams.
  • You own your database and files and can request copies, which limits lock-in.
  • Hosting in Germany is available for teams that need GDPR-friendly data residency.

Cons

  • Reviewers say the initial setup of entities, roles and automations takes time and some technical skill.
  • G2 reviewers point to a steep learning curve and limited documentation.
  • A few reviewers reported slower performance with large datasets.
  • Cloud support runs only 12 hours a day, 5 days a week, and the vendor team is very small.
  • Self-hosted users must pay for reporting and BPM through the Advanced Pack.

OroCRM logo
OroCRM

Pros

  • The Community Edition is open source under OSL-3.0, so you can self-host it with no licence fees.
  • The Symfony-based OroPlatform lets developers deeply customize entities, workflows and the user interface.
  • A built-in workflow engine covers leads, opportunities and tasks, and teams can add custom workflows.
  • Opportunities support multiple currencies, and Enterprise supports multiple organizations, which suits companies operating in several regions.
  • Mailchimp, Dotdigital and Zendesk integrations are documented.

Cons

  • Email campaigns depend on Mailchimp or Dotdigital, with no native email marketing engine.
  • Self-hosting and customization need PHP and Symfony developers.
  • Oro does not publish Enterprise pricing on its own site.
  • There are very few independent user reviews, which makes it hard to judge vendor support.

Not sold on either?

Related Comparisons