b stack radar

Dify vs Sana Comparison

Compare Dify vs Sana features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

Dify logo

Dify

7.3/10

Winner

Open-source platform for building LLM apps, agents, RAG knowledge pipelines and visual AI workflows, available as cloud SaaS or self-hosted.

Sana logo

Sana

6.5/10

Sana is an enterprise AI platform from Workday. It provides no-code AI agents, search across company knowledge, and meeting assistance for large organisations.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Dify logo
Dify
Sana logo
Sana
Scores
Overall Rating7.3/106.5/10
Integration7/107/10
Analytics6/106/10
Customization9/107/10
Ease of Use7/107/10
Support6/107/10
Cost8/103/10
Scalability6/108/10
Security8/108/10
Output Quality7/107/10
Pricing
Free planYesNo
Cheapest paid plan$59/mo
Professional
Contact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 users$159/mo
Team
Contact for pricing
Features
AI Agents
Chatbots
Enterprise Controls
Knowledge Base Search
Private Deployment
Text Generation
Workflow Automation
API AccessNot listed
TranscriptionNot listed

Dify vs Sana cost by team size

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Dify logo
Why choose Dify

  • Has a free plan (Sana does not)
  • Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 3/10)
  • Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Better fit for startups (9/10 vs 1/10)
  • Better fit for small business (6/10 vs 2/10)

Sana logo
Why choose Sana

  • Higher Scalability score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Support score (7/10 vs 6/10)

Pros & Cons

Dify logo
Dify

Pros

  • The Community Edition is free to self-host with no license fees, so the only costs are infrastructure and model APIs.
  • The visual workflow builder lets a team build a RAG support workflow with human handoff in under an hour, according to one review.
  • Document ingestion, chunking, embedding and retrieval are handled in a single interface.
  • Teams can switch between many model providers per node, including local models via Ollama.
  • Apps can be published as web apps, embeds, APIs or MCP tools.

Cons

  • Self-hosting needs Docker or Kubernetes skills, and reviewers report scaling problems under heavy workloads.
  • Reviewers say Dify has fewer connectors than rivals such as LangFlow.
  • Multi-agent orchestration and built-in observability are basic.
  • Workflows have no built-in version control, and the canvas can lag on large flows.
  • Removing Dify branding from self-hosted apps requires a commercial license.

Sana logo
Sana

Pros

  • Sana claims more than one million users, including Merck and Polestar, and the product is now backed by Workday.
  • Integrated sources keep their original permissions, which reduces the risk of oversharing in knowledge search.
  • Includes SAML SSO, SCIM, AES-256 encryption at rest and a single-tenant deployment option.
  • Handles many content types, including meeting recordings, Office files, spreadsheets and video.
  • Non-technical staff can build agents with the no-code builder and extend integrations through an MCP client.

Cons

  • There is no public pricing. Only a custom Enterprise quote is available.
  • The Free and Team plans were removed in 2026, so there is no way for small teams to start.
  • Independent reviews are scarce: Gartner Peer Insights showed only one rating.
  • Vendor pages contradict each other on SOC 2 status, listing both Type 1 and Type 2.
  • The roadmap now depends on Workday's agent strategy, which may matter less to companies that do not use Workday.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Dify scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.3/10 against 6.5/10 for Sana. The largest gap is in Cost: 8/10 for Dify and 3/10 for Sana.

Dify has a free plan; Sana does not list one.

Dify is the better fit for startups: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 1/10 for Sana.

Related Comparisons