Apache OFBiz vs HaloPSA: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Apache OFBiz and HaloPSA to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Apache OFBiz
5.9/10
Free, open-source Java suite of business applications from the Apache Software Foundation. It covers ERP, CRM, sales force automation, e-commerce and accounting for organisations that can self-host and customise it.
HaloPSA
7.1/10
HaloPSA is a professional services automation platform for managed service providers and IT service teams. It combines ticketing, projects, time tracking, billing and reporting.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 5.9/10 | 7.1/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Analytics | 4/10 | 7/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 3/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 2/10 | 5/10 |
| Security | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Cost | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | £66/user/mo Halo (single plan) |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Open source (self-hosted) | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Contact Management | Not listed | |
| Integrations | Not listed | |
| Lead Management | Not listed | |
| Marketing Automation | Not listed | |
| Opportunity Management | Not listed | |
| Reporting & Analytics | Not listed | |
| More features | ||
| Scheduling | Not listed | |
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| App integrations | Not listed | |
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Time tracking | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | Not listed | |
| Dashboards | Not listed | |
| Reporting | Not listed | |
| Knowledge base | Not listed | |
Apache OFBiz vs HaloPSA cost by team size
| Team size | Apache OFBiz | HaloPSA |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeOpen source (self-hosted) | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | FreeOpen source (self-hosted) | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | FreeOpen source (self-hosted) | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | FreeOpen source (self-hosted) | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | FreeOpen source (self-hosted) | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Apache OFBiz
- Has a free plan (HaloPSA does not)
- Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose HaloPSA
- Higher Support score (7/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Security score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for small business (7/10 vs 3/10)
- Better fit for mid-market (8/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Apache OFBiz
Pros
- No licence fees under Apache License 2.0, with full source code access.
- CRM shares one data model with accounting, orders, inventory and manufacturing, so customer records connect to the whole business.
- Highly extensible: the entity engine, service engine and widget framework let developers add custom features.
- Actively maintained, with security releases in 2026 and a community of 64 committers.
Cons
- Setup and configuration are hard. One 2026 reviewer spent six hours without getting the default environment working.
- Dated, developer-oriented interface that reviewers call user-unfriendly.
- No official vendor support. Help comes from the community or paid third parties.
- SFA screens have open bug reports and improvement requests, and they lack the modern CRM extras that hosted tools include.
- 2026 brought a sharp rise in vulnerability reports, so self-hosters must patch promptly.
HaloPSA
Pros
- One per-agent plan includes every module and the AI features, with no paid add-ons.
- Portal customers and end users are free, so client collaboration does not add licence cost.
- More than 250 integrations, including accounting and RMM tools, are included at no extra charge.
- Broad compliance coverage includes ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP and HIPAA, plus SSO and audit logs.
- Reviewers describe the browser interface as modern and fast.
Cons
- Reviewers say the configuration menus are convoluted, and a consultant is often needed to get the most out of it.
- A paid onboarding package is mandatory and its price is not published.
- The project features are oriented toward IT service delivery rather than complex professional services projects.
- Some users report slowness and weaker calendar, notification and stock-control features.
- Per-agent costs add up for larger teams.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
HaloPSA scores higher on our CRM criteria: 7.1/10 against 5.9/10 for Apache OFBiz. The largest gap is in Cost: 9/10 for Apache OFBiz and 5/10 for HaloPSA.
Apache OFBiz has a free plan; HaloPSA does not list one.
HaloPSA is the better fit for small business: we rate it 7/10 for them, against 3/10 for Apache OFBiz.
