Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs BlazingCDN Comparison
Compare Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs BlazingCDN features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
7.9/10
Amazon's public cloud platform, with over 200 pay-as-you-go services for compute, storage, databases, networking and AI, used by startups through large enterprises and governments.
BlazingCDN
5.9/10
BlazingCDN is a low-cost CDN from an EU-based company. It delivers static files, software downloads, video on demand and HLS streams for software, gaming and OTT businesses.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.9/10 | 5.9/10 |
| Integration | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Customization | 10/10 | 4/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $25/mo FLEX (pay-as-you-go) |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free plan | $25/mo FLEX (pay-as-you-go) |
| Features | ||
| Serverless Functions | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Content Delivery Network | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Object Storage | ||
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Free SSL Certificates | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs BlazingCDN cost by team size
Amazon Web Services (AWS) costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | BlazingCDN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree plan | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) |
| 5 users | FreeFree plan | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) |
| 10 users | FreeFree plan | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) |
| 25 users | FreeFree plan | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) |
| 50 users | FreeFree plan | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Amazon Web Services (AWS)
- Has a free plan (BlazingCDN does not)
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $25/mo
- Higher Customization score (10/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Integration score (10/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (10/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose BlazingCDN
- Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 4/10)
Pros & Cons
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Pros
- The service catalogue is unusually broad, with over 200 services across 38 regions, so most infrastructure needs can be met on one platform.
- EC2 has a 99.99% region-level SLA with credits of up to 100%, and instances unavailable for more than six minutes in an hour are not billed for that hour.
- The free plan gives up to $200 in credits, and more than 30 always-free services let new teams experiment at low cost.
- Support scales from a $29 minimum up to dedicated Enterprise and Unified Operations tiers for mission-critical workloads.
- G2 rates it 4.4 across more than 17,000 reviews, and reviewers praise its scalability and global reach.
Cons
- Reviewers widely cite a steep learning curve across the console and services.
- Usage pricing is complex and can produce unexpected bills unless spend is monitored closely.
- Paid support is billed as a percentage of total AWS spend, so support costs rise with usage.
- A July 2025 billing console bug showed customers estimated charges in the billions, which hurt trust in its cost tooling.
BlazingCDN
Pros
- Bandwidth starts at $5 per TB and falls to $2.50 per TB at petabyte volume, with requests not billed.
- No contract and no setup fee, with a $25 monthly minimum and payment by card, PayPal, bank transfer or invoice.
- Strong video content protection, including signed URLs, security tokens, per-copy fingerprinting and IP binding.
- Developer tooling includes a REST API, Prometheus metrics and an official MCP server with 52 tools.
- Support is available 24/7, and the vendor promises an engineer reply within 3 business hours.
- EU-headquartered with GDPR-compliant processing and EU invoicing.
Cons
- The vendor says it has no edge functions, HTTP/3, WebSockets or video transcoding.
- Third-party listings show no WAF, load balancing or multi-CDN switching.
- There is no free plan, and the 14-day testing period is billed at $5 per TB.
- No uptime SLA or PoP count is published.
- Almost no independent reviews exist; G2 shows none.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon Web Services (AWS) scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 5.9/10 for BlazingCDN. The largest gap is in Customization: 10/10 for Amazon Web Services (AWS) and 4/10 for BlazingCDN.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) costs less for 10 users: free on its Free plan, against about $25/mo on its FLEX (pay-as-you-go) plan for BlazingCDN, billed monthly.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) has a free plan; BlazingCDN does not list one.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 10/10 for them, against 5/10 for BlazingCDN.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) has Serverless Functions, which BlazingCDN lacks.
