Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Bare Metal Solution Comparison

Why choose Amazon Web Services (AWS)

• Has a free plan (Bare Metal Solution does not)
• Higher Scalability score (10/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 4/10)
• Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 2/10)
• Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 1/10)

B

Why choose Bare Metal Solution

Our data shows no clear advantage over Amazon Web Services (AWS).

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Pros

• The service catalogue is unusually broad, with over 200 services across 38 regions, so most infrastructure needs can be met on one platform.
• EC2 has a 99.99% region-level SLA with credits of up to 100%, and instances unavailable for more than six minutes in an hour are not billed for that hour.
• The free plan gives up to $200 in credits, and more than 30 always-free services let new teams experiment at low cost.
• Support scales from a $29 minimum up to dedicated Enterprise and Unified Operations tiers for mission-critical workloads.
• G2 rates it 4.4 across more than 17,000 reviews, and reviewers praise its scalability and global reach.

Cons

• Reviewers widely cite a steep learning curve across the console and services.
• Usage pricing is complex and can produce unexpected bills unless spend is monitored closely.
• Paid support is billed as a percentage of total AWS spend, so support costs rise with usage.
• A July 2025 billing console bug showed customers estimated charges in the billions, which hurt trust in its cost tooling.

B

Bare Metal Solution

Pros

• Single-tenant physical servers let Oracle BYOL be counted on physical cores, with no soft-partitioning risk.
• Low-latency, Google-managed interconnect to Google Cloud services, with no reported same-region transfer charges.
• A wide range of server sizes, including an 8-core option for licence right-sizing and up to 24 TB memory systems.
• A 99.9% uptime SLO per server, with credits of 10% to 50% of the monthly bill when it is missed.
• Available in 12 regions across four continents.

Cons

• No public pricing; every deployment goes through sales on a multi-year subscription.
• Customers handle OS licensing, patching, security and database administration; Google manages only the hardware and network.
• Storage volumes cannot be expanded after provisioning, and jumbo frames are not supported on VLAN attachments.
• Production deployments have historically needed four to eight weeks of lead time.
• Very few public user reviews (G2 lists only 4).