actiTIME vs HaloPSA: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of actiTIME and HaloPSA to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
actiTIME
6.3/10
actiTIME is time-tracking and project-cost software for small and mid-sized teams. It tracks billable hours, task progress, budgets, and leave, and is available in the cloud or self-hosted.
HaloPSA
7.1/10
HaloPSA is a professional services automation platform for managed service providers and IT service teams. It combines ticketing, projects, time tracking, billing and reporting.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | A actiTIME | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.3/10 | 7.1/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Integration | 4/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $5/user/mo Online (41-200 users) | £66/user/mo Halo (single plan) |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $60/mo Online (1-40 users) | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Reporting | ||
| Task management | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| Dashboards | Not listed | |
| Kanban boards | Not listed | |
| Knowledge base | Not listed | |
| Scheduling | Not listed | |
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | Not listed | |
actiTIME vs HaloPSA cost by team size
| Team size | actiTIME | HaloPSA |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | $30/moOnline (1-40 users) | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | $60/moOnline (1-40 users) | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | $150/moOnline (1-40 users) | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | $250/moOnline (41-200 users) | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
AWhy choose actiTIME
- Has a free plan (HaloPSA does not)
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for freelancers (6/10 vs 2/10)
- Better fit for startups (7/10 vs 4/10)
Why choose HaloPSA
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for mid-market (8/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
AactiTIME
Pros
- Low per-user price, falling to 5 USD per user per month above 40 users, plus a free plan for up to 3 users.
- Detailed billable and non-billable time tracking, with reports comparing actual time against estimates.
- Can be self-hosted, with direct database access, for organisations that keep data on their own servers.
- Pairs with actiPLANS for leave, PTO, and shift scheduling in a connected system.
- Reviewers on Software Finder give ease of use and support high marks (about 9 out of 10).
Cons
- Few native integrations: only QuickBooks, Zapier, the Chrome plugin, and actiPLANS are listed.
- Reviewers describe the interface as dated and cluttered.
- Task and project management is shallow compared with dedicated PM suites, and no Gantt view was found.
- Invoicing and reporting have gaps, including no saved recurring invoice items, according to reviewers.
- Self-hosted major upgrades cost the full original license price again.
HaloPSA
Pros
- One per-agent plan includes every module and the AI features, with no paid add-ons.
- Portal customers and end users are free, so client collaboration does not add licence cost.
- More than 250 integrations, including accounting and RMM tools, are included at no extra charge.
- Broad compliance coverage includes ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP and HIPAA, plus SSO and audit logs.
- Reviewers describe the browser interface as modern and fast.
Cons
- Reviewers say the configuration menus are convoluted, and a consultant is often needed to get the most out of it.
- A paid onboarding package is mandatory and its price is not published.
- The project features are oriented toward IT service delivery rather than complex professional services projects.
- Some users report slowness and weaker calendar, notification and stock-control features.
- Per-agent costs add up for larger teams.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
HaloPSA scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 7.1/10 against 6.3/10 for actiTIME. The largest gap is in Integration: 4/10 for actiTIME and 8/10 for HaloPSA.
ActiTIME has a free plan; HaloPSA does not list one.
ActiTIME is the better fit for freelancers: we rate it 6/10 for them, against 2/10 for HaloPSA.
