AceCloud vs Amazon Web Services (AWS) Comparison
Compare AceCloud vs Amazon Web Services (AWS) features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
AceCloud
6.1/10
Indian cloud provider from Real Time Data Services that rents NVIDIA GPU servers, compute instances, managed Kubernetes, storage and managed databases to businesses.
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
7.6/10
Amazon's public cloud platform, with over 200 pay-as-you-go services for compute, storage, databases, networking and AI, used by startups through large enterprises and governments.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.1/10 | 7.6/10 |
| Integration | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Analytics | 4/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 10/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 10/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | ₹1,349/mo S3a.medium (1 vCPU, 4 GB) | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | ₹1,349/mo S3a.medium (1 vCPU, 4 GB) | Free Free plan |
| Features | ||
| Managed Databases | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| VPS Hosting | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Content Delivery Network | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| API and CLI | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
AceCloud vs Amazon Web Services (AWS) cost by team size
| Team size | AceCloud | Amazon Web Services (AWS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | ₹1,349/moS3a.medium (1 vCPU, 4 GB) | FreeFree plan |
| 5 users | ₹1,349/moS3a.medium (1 vCPU, 4 GB) | FreeFree plan |
| 10 users | ₹1,349/moS3a.medium (1 vCPU, 4 GB) | FreeFree plan |
| 25 users | ₹1,349/moS3a.medium (1 vCPU, 4 GB) | FreeFree plan |
| 50 users | ₹1,349/moS3a.medium (1 vCPU, 4 GB) | FreeFree plan |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose AceCloud
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 4/10)
Why choose Amazon Web Services (AWS)
- Has a free plan (AceCloud does not)
- Higher Integration score (10/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (10/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
AceCloud
Pros
- Cheapest standard VM is INR 1,349 a month, with 10% and 20% discounts for 6- and 12-month commitments.
- Bandwidth is unmetered and there are no setup or migration fees, which keeps costs predictable.
- Wide NVIDIA range on one platform, from H200 and H100 to L4, plus reserved GPU capacity.
- Indian data centers and India-governed data ownership appeal to buyers with data residency requirements.
- Broad managed catalogue that includes Kafka, RabbitMQ and FerretDB, as well as PostgreSQL, MySQL and Redis.
Cons
- Very little independent review evidence: G2 shows no reviews and Trustpilot has only one or two.
- Only three listed locations (Noida, Mumbai, Atlanta), so global reach is far below the hyperscalers.
- Storage, Kubernetes and database prices are not shown on the main pricing page.
- Third-party listings disagree on the uptime figure (99.95% or 99.99%), the data center count, and the scope of SOC 2 and HIPAA coverage.
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Pros
- The service catalogue is unusually broad, with over 200 services across 38 regions, so most infrastructure needs can be met on one platform.
- EC2 has a 99.99% region-level SLA with credits of up to 100%, and instances unavailable for more than six minutes in an hour are not billed for that hour.
- The free plan gives up to $200 in credits, and more than 30 always-free services let new teams experiment at low cost.
- Support scales from a $29 minimum up to dedicated Enterprise and Unified Operations tiers for mission-critical workloads.
- G2 rates it 4.4 across more than 17,000 reviews, and reviewers praise its scalability and global reach.
Cons
- Reviewers widely cite a steep learning curve across the console and services.
- Usage pricing is complex and can produce unexpected bills unless spend is monitored closely.
- Paid support is billed as a percentage of total AWS spend, so support costs rise with usage.
- A July 2025 billing console bug showed customers estimated charges in the billions, which hurt trust in its cost tooling.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon Web Services (AWS) scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.6/10 against 6.1/10 for AceCloud. The largest gap is in Integration: 5/10 for AceCloud and 10/10 for Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Amazon Web Services (AWS) has a free plan; AceCloud does not list one.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 10/10 for them, against 6/10 for AceCloud.
