b stack radar

4Degrees vs Fin Comparison

Compare 4Degrees vs Fin features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

4Degrees logo

4Degrees

5.9/10

4Degrees is a relationship intelligence and deal flow CRM for private equity, venture capital, M&A advisory, corporate development, and consulting teams.

Fin logo

Fin

7.4/10

Winner

Fin is Intercom's AI customer service agent. It resolves support conversations across chat, email, voice and social, either inside Intercom or on top of an existing helpdesk.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
4Degrees logo
4Degrees
Fin logo
Fin
Scores
Overall Rating5.9/107.4/10
Analytics6/108/10
Cost5/104/10
Customization6/108/10
Ease of Use7/107/10
Integration6/108/10
Scalability5/109/10
Security5/109/10
Support7/105/10
Output Quality0/109/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricing$19/user/mo
Fin with Intercom
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingContact for pricing
Features
CollaborationNot listed
Contact ManagementNot listed
IntegrationsNot listed
Opportunity ManagementNot listed
Reporting & AnalyticsNot listed
Sales AutomationNot listed
AI AgentsNot listed
ChatbotsNot listed
Data AnalysisNot listed
API AccessNot listed
Enterprise ControlsNot listed
Knowledge Base SearchNot listed
Voice and AudioNot listed
Workflow AutomationNot listed

Which One Should You Choose?

4Degrees logo
Why choose 4Degrees

  • Higher Support score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Cost score (5/10 vs 4/10)

Fin logo
Why choose Fin

  • Higher Scalability score (9/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Security score (9/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for mid-market (9/10 vs 6/10)

Pros & Cons

4Degrees logo
4Degrees

Pros

  • Builds contact and deal records automatically from email and calendar activity, so deal teams do less manual data entry.
  • Relationship strength scoring helps investors find warm introduction paths to targets.
  • Alerts flag when contacts change jobs, publish content, or appear in the news.
  • Built for PE, VC, and M&A workflows by former Pritzker Group VC investors.
  • Pulls in third-party data from sources such as Crunchbase and PitchBook.

Cons

  • No public pricing, so every buyer has to request a quote.
  • Small company with modest disclosed funding.
  • Few independent reviews, and most detailed ones date from around 2019.
  • Older reviews asked for a better mobile app.
  • Not built for marketing automation or customer support use cases.

Fin logo
Fin

Pros

  • Intercom reports a 76% average resolution rate across more than 12,000 customers, and G2 reviewers praise how quick and human-sounding its answers are.
  • It runs on existing helpdesks such as Zendesk, Salesforce, HubSpot and Freshdesk, so teams do not have to move to Intercom.
  • Its compliance list is broad: SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 27701 and HIPAA, plus SSO, SCIM and data hosting in the US, EU or Australia.
  • Simulations and regression tests let teams check configuration changes before they go live.
  • There are no setup or platform fees, and the 14-day trial needs no credit card.

Cons

  • Per-outcome billing makes monthly costs hard to predict, and G2 reviewers report unexpected bills during volume spikes.
  • Inside Intercom, the per-seat helpdesk fees come on top of the outcome charges.
  • Fin can pull the wrong article when knowledge base topics overlap, so answer quality depends on well-kept help content.
  • A competitor's review says advanced Procedures and data connectors can take weeks to set up and may need technical skills.
  • Some reviewers complain about the responsiveness of Intercom's own customer support.

Related Comparisons