SenseHawk vs Sitemark Comparison
Compare SenseHawk vs Sitemark features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
SenseHawk
5.8/10
SenseHawk is a map-based platform for solar developers, EPCs and O&M teams. It covers construction tracking, drone thermal inspection and asset management for solar and storage sites.
Sitemark
6.2/10
Sitemark is a cloud platform for solar, battery storage and grid sites that combines drone and AI inspections, construction tracking and O&M work management.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 5.8/10 | 6.2/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Integration | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Asset Registry | ||
| Digital Twin | ||
| Drone Inspection | ||
| GIS and Mapping | ||
| Inspection Automation | ||
| Inspection Checklists | ||
| Work Orders | ||
| Document Control | Not listed | |
| Offline Field App | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose SenseHawk
- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Customization score (6/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Sitemark
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
SenseHawk
Pros
- Therm turns drone infrared scans into classified defects with power-loss estimates and IEC 62446-3 reports.
- Planned versus actual progress tracking can use imported Primavera P6 and MS Project schedules.
- The mobile app works offline and lets field crews close geotagged inspections and punch items.
- Security includes AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit, SAML SSO and fine-grained role-based access.
Cons
- No public pricing, so every quote requires a sales conversation.
- Built almost entirely for solar and storage, so it is a poor fit for other industrial assets.
- Very few independent reviews: G2 lists only about two reviews for SenseHawk.
- Ownership is unclear: Reliance took a majority stake in 2022, and Nextracker acquired SenseHawk IP in 2024.
Sitemark
Pros
- One platform covers the solar lifecycle, from construction progress and commissioning through thermography inspections and O&M work orders.
- Users on G2 and Capterra mainly praise the easy interface and quick support responses, with ratings around 4.8 on G2 and 5.0 on Capterra.
- Flexible data capture: teams can fly their own drones or order flights through Sitemark's partner network.
- Large installed base, with a claimed 1,300+ companies and 15,000+ sites across 100+ countries.
Cons
- No public pricing, so every buyer has to go through a quote or demo.
- The product is narrowly focused on solar and renewables and is not a general CMMS for other asset types.
- Integration and API details are not public, and SourceForge lists no API.
- Review volume is small: about 28 reviews on G2 and 5 on Capterra.
Not sold on either?
Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Sitemark scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.2/10 against 5.8/10 for SenseHawk. The largest gap is in Support: 5/10 for SenseHawk and 8/10 for Sitemark.
No, neither SenseHawk nor Sitemark lists a free plan.
