OnePlan vs Taiga (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
OnePlan is our pick, scoring 7/10 against 6.7/10 for Taiga on our Project Management criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 5/10). Only Taiga has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
OnePlan
7/10
OnePlan is a strategic portfolio and work management platform built on the Microsoft cloud for PMOs and enterprises that manage projects, resources, and budgets.
Taiga
6.7/10
Open-source agile project management tool with Scrum, Kanban and issue tracking for software and cross-functional teams, offered as cloud plans or self-hosted.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7/10 | 6.7/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Integration | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | $10/user/mo Basic | €5/mo Enthusiast |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $100/mo Basic | Free Free |
| Features | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Dashboards | ||
| Kanban boards | ||
| Reporting | ||
| Task management | ||
| Timeline view | ||
| Docs | Not listed | |
| Knowledge base | Not listed | |
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Time tracking | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | Not listed | |
OnePlan vs Taiga cost by team size
| Team size | OnePlan | Taiga |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $50/moBasic | FreeFree |
| 5 users | $50/moBasic | FreeFree |
| 10 users | $100/moBasic | FreeFree |
| 25 users | $250/moBasic | FreeFree |
| 50 users | $500/moBasic | FreeFree |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who OnePlan and Taiga suit
OnePlan fits enterprise and mid-market better; Taiga fits startups, developers, freelancers and small business better.
| Audience | OnePlan | Taiga |
|---|---|---|
| Startups | 2/10It is a PMO-focused platform and key features need a quoted Enterprise plan. | 8/10The free self-hosted version, cheap flat hosted plans and agile modules fit early product teams. |
| Developers | 4/10It pulls in Azure DevOps and Jira work for portfolio views, rather than serving developers directly. | 9/10It has Scrum backlogs, issue tracking and GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Gogs integrations for software teams. |
| Enterprise | 9/10Enterprise permissions, audit logs, financial and resource planning, and US government hosting are all aimed at large PMOs. | 4/10On-premise with an SLA is available, but there is little enterprise governance or analytics depth. |
| Freelancers | 1/10It has a five-user minimum and is built for PMOs. | 5/10There is a free plan and a 5 euro tier, but tiny storage limits hosted use. |
| Small Business | 3/10The five-user minimum, setup complexity, and portfolio focus make it heavy for small teams. | 7/10Unlimited users on flat-priced plans keep costs low for small teams, though the tool is focused on software work. |
| Mid-Market | 7/10The Basic tier at 10 dollars per user with a five-user minimum suits mid-size Microsoft shops, but the key planning features need Enterprise. | 5/10Private Cloud and On-premise options exist, but the tool is light on portfolio reporting and automation. |
| IT Teams | 6/10It integrates with Azure DevOps and Jira, and is built on the Microsoft stack with Entra ID. | 6/10It can be self-hosted free with Docker to keep data on your own servers. |
| Agencies | Not rated | 4/10There is no time tracking or client billing, which limits its use for agency work. |
| Consultancies | 5/10Resource capacity and timesheets help, but the product is designed for internal portfolio governance rather than client delivery. | Not rated |
| Finance Teams | 5/10Financial plans and what-if scenarios are in Enterprise. | Not rated |
| Government | 6/10US government hosting is sold as an option. | Not rated |
| Product Teams | Not rated | 7/10It has backlogs, epics, sprint planning and estimation for agile product planning. |
| Remote Teams | Not rated | 6/10It offers unlimited users, wiki, dashboards and Slack notifications for distributed teams. |
| SaaS Companies | Not rated | 7/10Its agile and bug-tracking modules suit teams shipping software. |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose OnePlan
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for mid-market (7/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Taiga
- Has a free plan (OnePlan does not)
- Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 2/10)
- Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 4/10)
Pros & Cons
OnePlan
Pros
- The integration catalog lists more than 40 connectors, covering Microsoft Project, Planner, Azure DevOps, Jira, Smartsheet, Workday, and SAP.
- Reviewers praise how configurable the workflows and templates are, which suits PMOs whose processes keep changing.
- Capacity and resource planning with utilization views is a widely cited strength.
- Viewing OnePlan OData in Power BI does not require a OnePlan license, which lowers the cost of sharing reports.
- The Basic entry price of 10 dollars per user per month is low for portfolio software.
Cons
- Roadmaps, resource and financial planning, scenarios, automation, and audit logs are Enterprise-only, and Enterprise has no public price.
- Reviewers report final quotes well above what they first expected.
- Setup and configuration have a learning curve, and onboarding can be slow.
- Advanced report layouts often need extra Power BI work.
- Basic is billed annually only and requires at least five users.
Taiga
Pros
- Every hosted plan allows unlimited users at a flat account price, so costs do not grow as the team grows.
- It is fully open source and can be self-hosted with Docker for free, keeping data on your own servers.
- Scrum backlogs, sprint boards, burndown charts and Kanban WIP limits cover the core agile workflows.
- Built-in GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Gogs integrations, plus webhooks, a REST API and Zapier, connect it to developer workflows.
- Importers for Trello, Jira, GitHub and Asana make it easier to move existing projects in.
Cons
- Storage on the hosted tiers is very small: 10MB on Free and 500MB on Basic.
- The vendor pages do not mention native time tracking, Gantt charts or automation rules.
- Reporting depends on dashboards and CSV exports rather than advanced analytics.
- Some self-hosting users describe it as bloated and clunky out of the box.
- Many review-site listings show outdated per-user prices that differ from the vendor's current per-account pricing.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
OnePlan scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 7/10 against 6.7/10 for Taiga. The largest gap is in Cost: 5/10 for OnePlan and 9/10 for Taiga.
Taiga has a free plan; OnePlan does not list one.
Taiga is the better fit for startups: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 2/10 for OnePlan.
