NocoBase vs Teable: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of NocoBase and Teable to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
NocoBase
6.7/10
Open-source, self-hosted no-code platform that technical teams use to build internal business systems such as project trackers, CRMs and ticketing tools.
Teable
6.8/10
Teable is an open-source, AI-assisted no-code database on PostgreSQL that gives teams a spreadsheet interface, app builder and automations, as cloud or self-hosted.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.7/10 | 6.8/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 4/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $13/user/mo Pro |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Community | Free Free |
| Features | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| Databases | ||
| Spreadsheet interface | ||
| File sharing | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Gantt charts | Not listed | |
| Timeline view | ||
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | ||
| Dashboards | ||
| Kanban boards | ||
| Reporting | Not listed | |
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| Collaboration tools | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose NocoBase
- Higher Security score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Integration score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for developers (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Teable
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Support score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for small business (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
NocoBase
Pros
- The free Community edition has no limits on users, apps or records, so self-hosting can cost far less than per-user cloud tools.
- Commercial editions are one-time licences ($800 Standard, $8,000 Professional), not recurring subscriptions.
- The data model is separate from the UI, so one table can drive a kanban board, Gantt chart, calendar, form and chart.
- Permissions can be set at the menu, data, field and action level, and self-hosting keeps all data in-house.
- The plugin architecture lets developers extend almost anything in TypeScript.
Cons
- Despite the no-code label, setup and maintenance need technical staff and server administration.
- It is a platform for building tools, not a ready-made project management app, so tracking features must be configured.
- Reviewers say it has fewer ready-made SaaS connectors than mature cloud tools.
- Key features such as SSO, approvals and external databases sit behind paid editions, and the Community licence requires the NocoBase logo.
- Paid editions include only one year of upgrades and support.
Teable
Pros
- Data lives in real PostgreSQL tables, so teams can query it with SQL and connect external BI or ETL tools.
- The free AGPL Community Edition can be self-hosted with Docker for full control over data.
- Annual paid seats ($13 for Pro, $20 for Business) cost less than comparable Airtable tiers.
- SSO is included in the Business plan without an enterprise contract.
- AI chat, AI fields and the App Builder let non-developers build schemas and internal apps from a description.
Cons
- Few native integrations, so most connections rely on the REST API and webhooks.
- AI credits can be used up quickly during heavy App Builder use.
- An independent review reports that audit logs are not yet available.
- No Gantt chart, time tracking or other dedicated project-management features.
- Few reviews on major sites such as G2, so independent evidence is thin.
