b stack radar

LiDAR360 vs Sitemark: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of LiDAR360 and Sitemark to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

LiDAR360 logo

LiDAR360

5.7/10

Windows desktop software from GreenValley International for processing LiDAR point clouds in surveying, forestry, mining and power line inspection work.

Sitemark logo

Sitemark

5.9/10

Winner

Sitemark is a cloud platform for solar, battery storage and grid sites that combines drone and AI inspections, construction tracking and O&M work management.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
LiDAR360 logo
LiDAR360
Sitemark logo
Sitemark
Scores
Overall Rating5.7/105.9/10
Integration5/104/10
Analytics8/107/10
Customization7/105/10
Ease of Use5/108/10
Support5/108/10
Cost5/105/10
Scalability7/107/10
Security4/105/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingContact for pricing
Features
Power Line InspectionNot listed
Work Orders
Offline Field AppNot listed
Digital Twin
Spare Parts InventoryNot listed
Drone Inspection
LiDAR ProcessingNot listed
GIS and MappingNot listed
Inspection AutomationNot listed
Inspection ChecklistsNot listed
Asset RegistryNot listed

Which One Should You Choose?

LiDAR360 logo
Why choose LiDAR360

  • Higher Customization score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Integration score (5/10 vs 4/10)

Sitemark logo
Why choose Sitemark

  • Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Support score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Includes Work Orders, which LiDAR360 lacks

Pros & Cons

LiDAR360 logo
LiDAR360

Pros

  • Covers the whole point cloud workflow in one tool, from strip alignment and registration through classification, terrain models and forestry metrics.
  • Strong forestry tools, including individual tree segmentation and per-tree height, crown and diameter measurements.
  • Handles very large datasets on a single workstation, with a distributed processing option for bigger jobs.
  • Supports AI classification with user-trainable models, according to reseller listings.

Cons

  • GreenValley publishes no prices, and reseller prices vary widely.
  • Desktop-only Windows software with no cloud collaboration.
  • Very few independent user reviews are available on review sites.
  • Each specialised workflow needs a separately purchased module.

Sitemark logo
Sitemark

Pros

  • One platform covers the solar lifecycle, from construction progress and commissioning through thermography inspections and O&M work orders.
  • Users on G2 and Capterra mainly praise the easy interface and quick support responses, with ratings around 4.8 on G2 and 5.0 on Capterra.
  • Flexible data capture: teams can fly their own drones or order flights through Sitemark's partner network.
  • Large installed base, with a claimed 1,300+ companies and 15,000+ sites across 100+ countries.

Cons

  • No public pricing, so every buyer has to go through a quote or demo.
  • The product is narrowly focused on solar and renewables and is not a general CMMS for other asset types.
  • Integration and API details are not public, and SourceForge lists no API.
  • Review volume is small: about 28 reviews on G2 and 5 on Capterra.

Not sold on either?

Air Inspection Automation (AiA) logo

Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product

Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.

Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools

Frequently Asked Questions

Sitemark scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 5.9/10 against 5.7/10 for LiDAR360. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 5/10 for LiDAR360 and 8/10 for Sitemark.

No, neither LiDAR360 nor Sitemark lists a free plan.

Sitemark has Work Orders, which LiDAR360 lacks.

Related Comparisons