HaloPSA vs Teamhood: Complete Comparison (2026)

Why choose HaloPSA

• Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Scalability score (8/10 vs 6/10)

Why choose Teamhood

• Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)

HaloPSA

Pros

• One per-agent plan includes every module and the AI features, with no paid add-ons.
• Portal customers and end users are free, so client collaboration does not add licence cost.
• More than 250 integrations, including accounting and RMM tools, are included at no extra charge.
• Broad compliance coverage includes ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP and HIPAA, plus SSO and audit logs.
• Reviewers describe the browser interface as modern and fast.

Cons

• Reviewers say the configuration menus are convoluted, and a consultant is often needed to get the most out of it.
• A paid onboarding package is mandatory and its price is not published.
• The project features are oriented toward IT service delivery rather than complex professional services projects.
• Some users report slowness and weaker calendar, notification and stock-control features.
• Per-agent costs add up for larger teams.

Teamhood

Pros

• One plan includes every feature: Gantt, capacity planning, timesheets, automation and the API
• Kanban boards and Gantt timelines run on the same task data, with dependencies that reschedule automatically
• Hosting can be EU-based SaaS, dedicated, hybrid or on-premise, which helps teams with strict data residency rules
• Reviewers consistently praise how quickly teams adopt it, and it holds a 4.7 rating on G2

Cons

• There are no native iOS or Android apps
• The integration library is smaller than Jira's or ClickUp's, and less common apps need Zapier or the API
• The 3-user minimum, with guests counted as paid licenses, raises costs for small teams and for client access
• Some users report occasional time-tracking inaccuracies and few reminder email options