b stack radar

Grist vs Stackby Comparison

Compare Grist vs Stackby features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

Grist logo

Grist

6.8/10

Grist is an open-source relational spreadsheet-database with Python formulas, available as a cloud service or self-hosted, for teams building custom trackers and lightweight apps.

Stackby logo

Stackby

6.8/10

Stackby is a no-code spreadsheet-database for small teams to organize projects, connect to outside APIs, and automate workflows without writing code.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Grist logo
Grist
Stackby logo
Stackby
Scores
Overall Rating6.8/106.8/10
Analytics6/106/10
Cost8/108/10
Customization9/108/10
Ease of Use6/107/10
Integration6/107/10
Scalability5/105/10
Security7/104/10
Support6/106/10
Pricing
Free planYesYes
Cheapest paid plan$10/user/mo
Pro
$9/user/mo
Economy
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Free
$90/mo
Economy
Features
App integrations
Client collaboration
Collaboration tools
Dashboards
Databases
File sharing
Reporting
Scheduling
Spreadsheet interface
Task lists
Timeline view
Workflow automation
Kanban boardsNot listed
Task managementNot listed

Grist vs Stackby cost by team size

Grist and Stackby cost the same up to 5 users; Grist costs less from 10 users.

Team sizeGristStackby
1 userFreeFreeFreeFree
5 usersFreeFreeFreeFree
10 usersFreeFree$90/moEconomy
25 usersFreeSelf-hosted Community$225/moEconomy
50 usersFreeSelf-hosted Community$450/moEconomy

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Grist logo
Why choose Grist

  • Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $90/mo
  • Higher Security score (7/10 vs 4/10)
  • Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 8/10)
  • Better fit for enterprise (6/10 vs 4/10)

Stackby logo
Why choose Stackby

  • Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 6/10)

Pros & Cons

Grist logo
Grist

Pros

  • Python formulas and relational references give more modelling power than ordinary spreadsheets.
  • The open-source core can be self-hosted for free, which is useful for privacy-sensitive organisations.
  • The free tier allows unlimited documents and up to 10 members.
  • Linked widgets (table, card, chart, calendar, form, custom) let teams build tailored project apps.
  • Reviewers praise the responsive support team and active community.

Cons

  • There are no built-in Kanban or Gantt views, so project workflows must be assembled by hand.
  • Per-document record caps (5,000 on Free, 150,000 on Business) limit large datasets.
  • The company has acknowledged performance concerns with large databases.
  • Automations require the $30-per-user Business plan, which has a five-user minimum.
  • Few public reviews exist, and no compliance certifications are listed.

Stackby logo
Stackby

Pros

  • Read-only guests, form submissions and share links are free, and only editors are billed.
  • API connector columns pull marketing data from Meta Ads, YouTube and Google Analytics into tables.
  • Annual plans start at $4.20 per user per month, which a reviewer said undercuts Airtable for similar features.
  • Integrates with Zapier, Make, Slack, Teams and AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Gemini.

Cons

  • Reviewers report occasional slow loading and glitches.
  • The mobile app supports fewer advanced features than the desktop version.
  • No public SOC 2 or similar compliance certifications.
  • The pricing page lists conflicting Enterprise limits.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Grist and Stackby both score 6.8/10 on our Project Management criteria. The largest gap is in Security: 7/10 for Grist and 4/10 for Stackby.

Grist costs less for 10 users: free on its Free plan, against about $90/mo on its Economy plan for Stackby, billed monthly.

Yes, both Grist and Stackby have a free plan.

Grist is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 6/10 for them, against 4/10 for Stackby.

Related Comparisons