b stack radar

Fluidstack vs Gcore Comparison

Compare Fluidstack vs Gcore features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

Fluidstack logo

Fluidstack

5.9/10

Fluidstack builds and runs large GPU clusters and custom AI data centers for frontier AI labs and enterprises that train and serve large models.

Gcore logo

Gcore

6.8/10

Winner

Luxembourg-based edge and cloud provider offering CDN, virtual machines, bare metal, managed Kubernetes, object storage, AI GPU cloud, and DDoS/WAF security for businesses.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Fluidstack logo
Fluidstack
Gcore logo
Gcore
Scores
Overall Rating5.9/106.8/10
Integration4/107/10
Analytics5/107/10
Customization8/107/10
Ease of Use4/106/10
Support7/105/10
Cost6/107/10
Scalability10/108/10
Security5/108/10
Pricing
Free planNoYes
Cheapest paid planContact for pricing€390/mo
DDoS Protection Start
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricing€390/mo
DDoS Protection Start
Features
Managed WordPressNot listed
Multiple Regions
Managed Kubernetes
Dedicated Servers
Shared HostingNot listed
API and CLINot listed
Managed DatabasesNot listed
DDoS ProtectionNot listed
Object StorageNot listed
Serverless FunctionsNot listed
Cloud ComputeNot listed
Content Delivery NetworkNot listed

Fluidstack vs Gcore cost by team size

Team sizeFluidstackGcore
1 userContact for pricing€390/moDDoS Protection Start
5 usersContact for pricing€390/moDDoS Protection Start
10 usersContact for pricing€390/moDDoS Protection Start
25 usersContact for pricing€390/moDDoS Protection Start
50 usersContact for pricing€390/moDDoS Protection Start

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Fluidstack logo
Why choose Fluidstack

  • Higher Support score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Scalability score (10/10 vs 8/10)

Gcore logo
Why choose Gcore

  • Has a free plan (Fluidstack does not)
  • Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 4/10)
  • Higher Security score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for developers (8/10 vs 4/10)

Pros & Cons

Fluidstack logo
Fluidstack

Pros

  • Can build and deliver capacity at gigawatt scale, which is why Anthropic chose it for its Texas and New York data centers.
  • Runs managed Slurm and Kubernetes on bare metal, so training teams do not have to operate the cluster themselves.
  • SemiAnalysis gave its GPU clusters a ClusterMAX Gold rating.
  • Heavily funded, including an $830M Series A in January 2026, which lowers the risk that the supplier fails.

Cons

  • There is no public rate card or self-serve signup, so pricing requires a sales quote.
  • Public documentation on APIs, storage and compliance certifications is scarce.
  • Third-party sources say its GPU catalog is narrower than marketplace providers and that on-demand billing is per hour.
  • It offers no general web hosting, managed databases or app platform services.

Gcore logo
Gcore

Pros

  • The CDN includes 1 TB of traffic and 1 billion requests free each month, and traffic after that starts at 0.01 EUR per GB.
  • DDoS protection pricing does not depend on attack size, and mitigation is not metered on any plan.
  • The managed Kubernetes control plane is free with high availability, so you pay only for the nodes.
  • A large edge footprint, reported at about 210 PoPs and 200 Tbps of capacity, suits latency-sensitive workloads such as gaming and streaming.
  • Headquarters in Luxembourg is an advantage for buyers who prefer an EU-based provider.

Cons

  • Trustpilot scores are around 2.5 out of 5, with complaints about recurring billing, refunds, and slow support.
  • There is no public price list for VMs and bare metal; prices are only available through the calculator.
  • The Terraform v2 provider is still in alpha and Gcore says it is not ready for production.
  • The product range is very broad, which can make it harder for small teams to understand how pricing works.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Gcore scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 5.9/10 for Fluidstack. The largest gap is in Integration: 4/10 for Fluidstack and 7/10 for Gcore.

Gcore has a free plan; Fluidstack does not list one.

Gcore is the better fit for developers: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 4/10 for Fluidstack.

Related Comparisons