b stack radar

Dify vs Langdock Comparison

Compare Dify vs Langdock features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

Dify logo

Dify

7.3/10

Winner

Open-source platform for building LLM apps, agents, RAG knowledge pipelines and visual AI workflows, available as cloud SaaS or self-hosted.

Langdock logo

Langdock

7.1/10

Langdock is a Berlin-based, EU-hosted AI workspace where company teams chat with many AI models, build custom agents, and automate workflows under central governance.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Dify logo
Dify
Langdock logo
Langdock
Scores
Overall Rating7.3/107.1/10
Analytics6/106/10
Cost8/105/10
Customization9/108/10
Ease of Use7/107/10
Integration7/107/10
Output Quality7/108/10
Scalability6/108/10
Security8/109/10
Support6/107/10
Pricing
Free planYesNo
Cheapest paid plan$59/mo
Professional
€23/user/mo
Core
Estimated cost for 10 users$159/mo
Team
€232/mo
Core
Features
AI Agents
API Access
Chatbots
Enterprise Controls
Knowledge Base Search
Private Deployment
Text Generation
Workflow Automation
TranscriptionNot listed

Dify vs Langdock cost by team size

Team sizeDifyLangdock
1 userFreeSandbox€23/moCore
5 users$159/moTeam€116/moCore
10 users$159/moTeam€232/moCore
25 users$159/moTeam€580/moCore
50 users$159/moTeam€1,160/moCore

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Dify logo
Why choose Dify

  • Has a free plan (Langdock does not)
  • Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 8/10)
  • Better fit for startups (9/10 vs 4/10)
  • Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 6/10)

Langdock logo
Why choose Langdock

  • Higher Scalability score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Output Quality score (8/10 vs 7/10)

Pros & Cons

Dify logo
Dify

Pros

  • The Community Edition is free to self-host with no license fees, so the only costs are infrastructure and model APIs.
  • The visual workflow builder lets a team build a RAG support workflow with human handoff in under an hour, according to one review.
  • Document ingestion, chunking, embedding and retrieval are handled in a single interface.
  • Teams can switch between many model providers per node, including local models via Ollama.
  • Apps can be published as web apps, embeds, APIs or MCP tools.

Cons

  • Self-hosting needs Docker or Kubernetes skills, and reviewers report scaling problems under heavy workloads.
  • Reviewers say Dify has fewer connectors than rivals such as LangFlow.
  • Multi-agent orchestration and built-in observability are basic.
  • Workflows have no built-in version control, and the canvas can lag on large flows.
  • Removing Dify branding from self-hosted apps requires a commercial license.

Langdock logo
Langdock

Pros

  • Access to 40+ models from several providers in one interface, so teams can switch models without buying separate ChatGPT and Claude licences.
  • Strong EU compliance posture: ISO 27001 certification, a SOC 2 Type II audit, GDPR compliance and EU hosting on Azure.
  • SSO, SCIM and SAML are included even on the entry Core plan.
  • Non-technical staff can build no-code agents with their own knowledge bases and permissions.
  • Deployment options range from multi-tenant SaaS to single-tenant, bring-your-own-cloud and on-premise Kubernetes.

Cons

  • There is no permanent free tier, only a 7-day trial.
  • Dedicated and on-premise deployments require 2,000 to 5,000+ seats.
  • Reviewers say its workflows still leave many actions to humans, so automation of operational tasks is limited.
  • Building advanced agents has a learning curve.
  • Per-seat pricing with Max seat upgrades and workflow add-ons can get expensive for small teams.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Dify scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.3/10 against 7.1/10 for Langdock. The largest gap is in Cost: 8/10 for Dify and 5/10 for Langdock.

Dify has a free plan; Langdock does not list one.

Dify is the better fit for startups: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 4/10 for Langdock.

Related Comparisons