Cyberhawk vs Pointivo Comparison
Compare Cyberhawk vs Pointivo features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Cyberhawk
6.5/10
Cyberhawk provides drone inspection services and the iHawk cloud platform. iHawk turns aerial inspection data into geolocated asset models with AI defect detection for utilities and energy operators.
Pointivo
5.6/10
Pointivo is AI software that turns drone imagery into measured 3D digital twins of assets. Its main use is telecom tower inspection, mount mapping and audits.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.5/10 | 5.6/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 3/10 | 4/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Asset Registry | ||
| Digital Twin | ||
| Drone Inspection | ||
| Inspection Automation | ||
| Condition Monitoring | Not listed | |
| GIS and Mapping | Not listed | |
| Power Line Inspection | Not listed | |
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Cyberhawk
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for energy companies (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for utilities (9/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Pointivo
- Higher Cost score (4/10 vs 3/10)
Pros & Cons
Cyberhawk
Pros
- Combines inspection flights by its own pilots with the software, so a utility can outsource the whole inspection program to one vendor.
- Proven at large grid scale, including more than 11,500 SSEN transmission towers and nearly 150 substations.
- The vendor says iHawk connects to EAM, WFM and OMS systems through open APIs.
- Ingests drone, satellite, helicopter, ground camera and IoT sensor data into one map-based view.
- The vendor offers structured onboarding and 24/7 technical support with SLAs.
Cons
- No public pricing and no self-serve or trial tier.
- Very little independent user review coverage, so most claims come from the vendor.
- Mainly aimed at large utilities and energy companies, so it is a poor fit for small teams.
- Ownership changed to Ondas in 2026, which could affect the product roadmap.
Pointivo
Pros
- It specializes in telecom towers: it identifies antennas and equipment and measures mount members automatically.
- Pointivo says mount mapping takes as little as 5 days instead of 4 to 10 weeks, and the data imports into AutoCAD and RISA-3D.
- Reports usually arrive within 48 hours and follow the client's existing templates.
- It has been used at scale: Pointivo reports more than 50,000 towers processed and holds about 20 patents.
Cons
- No public pricing; every deal is quote-based.
- No user reviews on G2, Capterra or similar sites, so independent evidence is scarce.
- One 2026 roundup notes it is an inspection and measurement tool rather than a broad portfolio-management platform.
- No security or compliance certifications are publicly documented.
Not sold on either?
Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Cyberhawk scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.5/10 against 5.6/10 for Pointivo. The largest gap is in Support: 8/10 for Cyberhawk and 5/10 for Pointivo.
No, neither Cyberhawk nor Pointivo lists a free plan.
Cyberhawk is the better fit for energy companies: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 5/10 for Pointivo.
