Cyberhawk vs Katapult Pro: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Cyberhawk and Katapult Pro to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Cyberhawk
6.5/10
Cyberhawk provides drone inspection services and the iHawk cloud platform. iHawk turns aerial inspection data into geolocated asset models with AI defect detection for utilities and energy operators.
Katapult Pro
6.5/10
Katapult Pro is a cloud pole attachment platform. It covers field data collection, make-ready engineering design, and joint use management for utilities, telecom builders, and OSP engineering firms.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 3/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $116/mo Data Collection |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | $116/mo Data Collection |
| Features | ||
| Asset Registry | ||
| GIS and Mapping | ||
| Power Line Inspection | ||
| Condition Monitoring | Not listed | |
| Digital Twin | Not listed | |
| Drone Inspection | Not listed | |
| Engineering Design | Not listed | |
| Engineering Simulation | Not listed | |
| Inspection Automation | Not listed | |
| Inspection Checklists | Not listed | |
| Safety and Compliance | Not listed | |
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
Cyberhawk vs Katapult Pro cost by team size
| Team size | Cyberhawk | Katapult Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | $116/moData Collection |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | $116/moData Collection |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | $116/moData Collection |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | $116/moData Collection |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | $116/moData Collection |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Cyberhawk
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Security score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for energy companies (9/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Katapult Pro
- Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Cyberhawk
Pros
- Combines inspection flights by its own pilots with the software, so a utility can outsource the whole inspection program to one vendor.
- Proven at large grid scale, including more than 11,500 SSEN transmission towers and nearly 150 substations.
- The vendor says iHawk connects to EAM, WFM and OMS systems through open APIs.
- Ingests drone, satellite, helicopter, ground camera and IoT sensor data into one map-based view.
- The vendor offers structured onboarding and 24/7 technical support with SLAs.
Cons
- No public pricing and no self-serve or trial tier.
- Very little independent user review coverage, so most claims come from the vendor.
- Mainly aimed at large utilities and energy companies, so it is a poor fit for small teams.
- Ownership changed to Ondas in 2026, which could affect the product roadmap.
Katapult Pro
Pros
- Pricing is published, contracts are month to month, and there is no cancellation penalty, which is rare among pole engineering tools.
- Read-only users are free, so stakeholders can review data without paying for a license.
- Field crews can collect pole photos and heights without entering the power space, and photos are matched to poles automatically.
- Clearance violation detection and pole loading are built in, with SPIDAcalc export included.
- Joint use workflows track FCC shot clock deadlines for utilities.
Cons
- O-Calc Pro export costs an extra $231 a month.
- Joint Use Management and Site License pricing are not published.
- The one-time setup fee of $1,815, plus optional equipment the site lists at $3,200 to $3,450, raises the cost of getting started.
- Reviewers say results depend on clean, consistent input data, and clearance checks can feel worksheet-like for edge cases.
- It is focused on pole attachment work and does not offer general CMMS features such as work orders or spare parts.
Not sold on either?
Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Cyberhawk and Katapult Pro both score 6.5/10 on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. The largest gap is in Cost: 3/10 for Cyberhawk and 6/10 for Katapult Pro.
No, neither Cyberhawk nor Katapult Pro lists a free plan.
Cyberhawk is the better fit for energy companies: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 6/10 for Katapult Pro.
