Crusoe Cloud vs Latitude.sh: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Crusoe Cloud and Latitude.sh to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Crusoe Cloud
6.6/10
Crusoe Cloud is a GPU-focused AI cloud that offers NVIDIA and AMD GPU instances, managed Kubernetes, storage and managed inference to AI teams and enterprises.
Latitude.sh
6.8/10
Bare metal cloud provider that offers dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual machines on demand, billed hourly or monthly, for developers and infrastructure-heavy businesses.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 6.8/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Multiple Regions | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
Crusoe Cloud vs Latitude.sh cost by team size
| Team size | Crusoe Cloud | Latitude.sh |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Crusoe Cloud
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Latitude.sh
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Crusoe Cloud
Pros
- SemiAnalysis gave it a ClusterMAX Gold rating and praised how easy the console is to use, along with its fault management.
- Reviewers describe hands-on, white-glove engineering support.
- It covers NVIDIA H100 through B300 and AMD MI355X GPUs, with InfiniBand clusters.
- CPU, storage and Kubernetes rates are published openly, for example $0.10 per Kubernetes cluster-hour.
- Developers get a CLI, a Terraform provider, an API and an MCP server for automation.
Cons
- There are few independent user reviews on G2, Capterra or Gartner.
- It has fewer managed services and a narrower geographic footprint than the hyperscalers.
- Self-serve GPU rates on the pricing page are set to rise from December 1, 2026.
- Service terms reportedly exclude HIPAA-regulated workloads.
Latitude.sh
Pros
- Prices for every metal, GPU and VM plan are listed publicly, with hourly rates as well as monthly ones.
- Each listed plan includes 20 TB of outbound bandwidth, and inbound traffic is unlimited.
- Servers are offered in 26 locations, including several in Latin America such as Sao Paulo, Bogota, Santiago, Buenos Aires and Mexico City.
- Servers can be automated through the API, SDKs, CLI and a Terraform provider.
- Current-generation AMD EPYC hardware runs alongside B300, RTX PRO 6000 and H100 GPU options.
Cons
- There is no managed WordPress, managed database or serverless offering, so you need operations expertise.
- Independent user reviews are scarce, and PeerSpot shows no reviews at all.
- Bandwidth overage rates and storage prices are not shown on the main pricing page.
- The Megaport acquisition may change the roadmap over time, although Latitude.sh says the brand and billing stay the same.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Latitude.sh scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.6/10 for Crusoe Cloud. The largest gap is in Customization: 7/10 for Crusoe Cloud and 8/10 for Latitude.sh.
No, neither Crusoe Cloud nor Latitude.sh lists a free plan.
