Crusoe Cloud vs Fluidstack: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Crusoe Cloud and Fluidstack to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Crusoe Cloud
6.6/10
Crusoe Cloud is a GPU-focused AI cloud that offers NVIDIA and AMD GPU instances, managed Kubernetes, storage and managed inference to AI teams and enterprises.
Fluidstack
5.9/10
Fluidstack builds and runs large GPU clusters and custom AI data centers for frontier AI labs and enterprises that train and serve large models.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 5.9/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 4/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 10/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Multiple Regions | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Crusoe Cloud
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Integration score (6/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for developers (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Fluidstack
- Higher Scalability score (10/10 vs 8/10)
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Crusoe Cloud
Pros
- SemiAnalysis gave it a ClusterMAX Gold rating and praised how easy the console is to use, along with its fault management.
- Reviewers describe hands-on, white-glove engineering support.
- It covers NVIDIA H100 through B300 and AMD MI355X GPUs, with InfiniBand clusters.
- CPU, storage and Kubernetes rates are published openly, for example $0.10 per Kubernetes cluster-hour.
- Developers get a CLI, a Terraform provider, an API and an MCP server for automation.
Cons
- There are few independent user reviews on G2, Capterra or Gartner.
- It has fewer managed services and a narrower geographic footprint than the hyperscalers.
- Self-serve GPU rates on the pricing page are set to rise from December 1, 2026.
- Service terms reportedly exclude HIPAA-regulated workloads.
Fluidstack
Pros
- Can build and deliver capacity at gigawatt scale, which is why Anthropic chose it for its Texas and New York data centers.
- Runs managed Slurm and Kubernetes on bare metal, so training teams do not have to operate the cluster themselves.
- SemiAnalysis gave its GPU clusters a ClusterMAX Gold rating.
- Heavily funded, including an $830M Series A in January 2026, which lowers the risk that the supplier fails.
Cons
- There is no public rate card or self-serve signup, so pricing requires a sales quote.
- Public documentation on APIs, storage and compliance certifications is scarce.
- Third-party sources say its GPU catalog is narrower than marketplace providers and that on-demand billing is per hour.
- It offers no general web hosting, managed databases or app platform services.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Crusoe Cloud scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.6/10 against 5.9/10 for Fluidstack. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 7/10 for Crusoe Cloud and 4/10 for Fluidstack.
No, neither Crusoe Cloud nor Fluidstack lists a free plan.
Crusoe Cloud is the better fit for developers: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 4/10 for Fluidstack.
