CoreWeave vs Nebius: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of CoreWeave and Nebius to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
CoreWeave
6.4/10
CoreWeave is a GPU-focused cloud that rents NVIDIA GPU and CPU instances, managed Kubernetes, and storage to teams training and serving AI models.
Nebius
6.6/10
Nebius is an AI-focused cloud that rents NVIDIA GPU instances and clusters by the hour, with managed Kubernetes, Slurm, storage and inference services for ML teams.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.4/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Managed Databases | ||
| Managed WordPress | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Object Storage | ||
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | ||
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose CoreWeave
- Higher Support score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Scalability score (9/10 vs 8/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Nebius
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Includes Managed Databases, which CoreWeave lacks
- Includes Serverless Functions, which CoreWeave lacks
Pros & Cons
CoreWeave
Pros
- Free internet egress and internal data transfer, which lowers the cost of moving large datasets and model checkpoints.
- Large inventory of current NVIDIA hardware, from L40S to GB200 NVL72, with InfiniBand for multi-node training.
- Spot rates are well below on-demand rates, for example $19.71 versus $49.24 per hour for an 8-GPU H100 node, and committed discounts reach up to 60%.
- The CKS control plane and SUNK Slurm scheduler are free, so you pay only for compute.
- A Terraform and OpenTofu provider manages clusters, VPCs, storage, and inference as code.
Cons
- No free tier or trial credits, and minimum spend is reported to be high even for light use.
- No managed databases, serverless functions, or CDN, so a second cloud is often needed.
- Regions are concentrated in North America and Europe, with limited Asia-Pacific coverage.
- The best pricing usually requires multi-year contracts and an enterprise sales process.
- Few public user reviews are available on G2 or Gartner to validate claims.
Nebius
Pros
- Newest NVIDIA hardware, including B300 and GB300 NVL72, is listed with published per-hour prices.
- Network egress, ingress and public IPs are free, which removes a common hidden cost on hyperscalers.
- The certification list is broad: SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, several ISO standards including 27001 and 42001, and CSA STAR.
- EU data centers in Finland and Paris help with GDPR and data residency.
- Infrastructure as code is fully supported through a CLI, a Terraform provider, gRPC and REST APIs, and SDKs.
Cons
- The catalogue is narrow outside AI. The only managed database is PostgreSQL, and there is no CDN or web hosting.
- Some users report slower support responses than AWS or CoreWeave.
- Users note documentation gaps for advanced setups.
- Kubernetes and Slurm workflows assume DevOps expertise.
- Commitment pricing and the largest clusters require contacting sales.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Nebius scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.6/10 against 6.4/10 for CoreWeave. The largest gap is in Support: 7/10 for CoreWeave and 5/10 for Nebius.
No, neither CoreWeave nor Nebius lists a free plan.
CoreWeave is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for Nebius.
Nebius has Managed Databases and Serverless Functions, which CoreWeave lacks.
