Bare Metal Solution vs Gcore: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Bare Metal Solution and Gcore to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Bare Metal Solution
5.6/10
Google Cloud service that provides dedicated, single-tenant physical servers in regional extensions for Oracle and other specialized enterprise workloads, connected to Google Cloud.
Gcore
6.9/10
Luxembourg-based edge and cloud provider offering CDN, virtual machines, bare metal, managed Kubernetes, object storage, AI GPU cloud, and DDoS/WAF security for businesses.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | B Bare Metal Solution | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 5.6/10 | 6.9/10 |
| Analytics | 4/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 3/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 3/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | €390/mo DDoS Protection Start |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | €390/mo DDoS Protection Start |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Dedicated Servers | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
Bare Metal Solution vs Gcore cost by team size
| Team size | Bare Metal Solution | Gcore |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | €390/moDDoS Protection Start |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | €390/moDDoS Protection Start |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | €390/moDDoS Protection Start |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | €390/moDDoS Protection Start |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | €390/moDDoS Protection Start |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
BWhy choose Bare Metal Solution
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Higher Support score (6/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Gcore
- Has a free plan (Bare Metal Solution does not)
- Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for startups (6/10 vs 2/10)
Pros & Cons
BBare Metal Solution
Pros
- Single-tenant physical servers let Oracle BYOL be counted on physical cores, with no soft-partitioning risk.
- Low-latency, Google-managed interconnect to Google Cloud services, with no reported same-region transfer charges.
- A wide range of server sizes, including an 8-core option for licence right-sizing and up to 24 TB memory systems.
- A 99.9% uptime SLO per server, with credits of 10% to 50% of the monthly bill when it is missed.
- Available in 12 regions across four continents.
Cons
- No public pricing; every deployment goes through sales on a multi-year subscription.
- Customers handle OS licensing, patching, security and database administration; Google manages only the hardware and network.
- Storage volumes cannot be expanded after provisioning, and jumbo frames are not supported on VLAN attachments.
- Production deployments have historically needed four to eight weeks of lead time.
- Very few public user reviews (G2 lists only 4).
Gcore
Pros
- The CDN includes 1 TB of traffic and 1 billion requests free each month, and traffic after that starts at 0.01 EUR per GB.
- DDoS protection pricing does not depend on attack size, and mitigation is not metered on any plan.
- The managed Kubernetes control plane is free with high availability, so you pay only for the nodes.
- A large edge footprint, reported at about 210 PoPs and 200 Tbps of capacity, suits latency-sensitive workloads such as gaming and streaming.
- Headquarters in Luxembourg is an advantage for buyers who prefer an EU-based provider.
Cons
- Trustpilot scores are around 2.5 out of 5, with complaints about recurring billing, refunds, and slow support.
- There is no public price list for VMs and bare metal; prices are only available through the calculator.
- The Terraform v2 provider is still in alpha and Gcore says it is not ready for production.
- The product range is very broad, which can make it harder for small teams to understand how pricing works.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Gcore scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 6.9/10 against 5.6/10 for Bare Metal Solution. The largest gap is in Cost: 3/10 for Bare Metal Solution and 7/10 for Gcore.
Gcore has a free plan; Bare Metal Solution does not list one.
Gcore is the better fit for startups: we rate it 6/10 for them, against 2/10 for Bare Metal Solution.
