b stack radar

ArcGIS vs PLS-CADD Comparison

Compare ArcGIS vs PLS-CADD features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

ArcGIS logo

ArcGIS

7.2/10

Winner

Esri's GIS platform for mapping, spatial analysis and field data collection, used by utilities, governments and infrastructure owners to manage networks and assets.

P

PLS-CADD

6.4/10

Windows software from Bentley's Power Line Systems for 3D design, sag-tension and structural analysis of overhead transmission, distribution and telecom lines.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
ArcGIS logo
ArcGIS
P
PLS-CADD
Scores
Overall Rating7.2/106.4/10
Analytics9/109/10
Cost3/103/10
Customization8/107/10
Ease of Use5/104/10
Integration8/107/10
Scalability9/107/10
Security7/105/10
Support7/107/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingContact for pricing
Features
Asset RegistryNot listed
Engineering DesignNot listed
Engineering SimulationNot listed
GIS and MappingNot listed
Inspection ChecklistsNot listed
LiDAR ProcessingNot listed
Offline Field AppNot listed
Work OrdersNot listed

Which One Should You Choose?

ArcGIS logo
Why choose ArcGIS

  • Higher Scalability score (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Higher Security score (7/10 vs 5/10)

P
Why choose PLS-CADD

Our data shows no clear advantage over ArcGIS.

Pros & Cons

ArcGIS logo
ArcGIS

Pros

  • One platform covers desktop, cloud, self-hosted and mobile GIS, so office and field teams work from the same data.
  • Field Maps works fully offline for maps, forms, tasks and utility network tracing.
  • Integrates with Cityworks, Salesforce, Power Automate and offers APIs for custom systems.
  • G2 reviewers praise how it handles layers and datasets and how easy cloud access makes remote work.

Cons

  • No public pricing, and reviewers cite subscription and credit costs as the main complaint.
  • Credits are consumed by premium services, which can limit heavy use.
  • ArcGIS Online lacks some geoprocessing tools found in ArcGIS Pro and Desktop.
  • Reviewers report a steep learning curve without training.

P
PLS-CADD

Pros

  • Bentley says it is used by more than 1,600 organizations in over 125 countries, and the acquisition announcement called it the US industry standard for transmission line design.
  • Combines terrain modeling, sag-tension and thermal ratings (IEEE 738 and CIGRE 207) in one tool.
  • Imports and classifies large LiDAR point clouds, and its AMBER tool builds line models from them automatically.
  • Plan and profile drawings regenerate automatically when the design changes.
  • Links directly to PLS-POLE, TOWER and the SAPS finite element engine for structural checks.

Cons

  • No public pricing; buyers must request a quote.
  • Bentley recommends about five days of training, so new users face a steep learning curve.
  • Runs on Windows only.
  • Covers design only: there are no work orders, maintenance or field inspection tools.

Not sold on either?

Air Inspection Automation (AiA) logo

Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product

Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.

Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools

Frequently Asked Questions

ArcGIS scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 7.2/10 against 6.4/10 for PLS-CADD. The largest gap is in Scalability: 9/10 for ArcGIS and 7/10 for PLS-CADD.

No, neither ArcGIS nor PLS-CADD lists a free plan.

Related Comparisons