b stack radar

Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Google Cloud Comparison

Compare Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Google Cloud features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

Amazon Web Services (AWS) logo

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

7.6/10

Winner

Amazon's public cloud platform, with over 200 pay-as-you-go services for compute, storage, databases, networking and AI, used by startups through large enterprises and governments.

Google Cloud logo

Google Cloud

7.3/10

Google's public cloud platform providing pay-as-you-go virtual machines, Kubernetes, serverless, databases, storage, networking, data analytics and AI services for businesses of every size.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Amazon Web Services (AWS) logo
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Google Cloud logo
Google Cloud
Scores
Overall Rating7.6/107.3/10
Analytics8/109/10
Cost5/105/10
Customization10/109/10
Ease of Use4/105/10
Integration10/108/10
Scalability10/1010/10
Security9/109/10
Support6/105/10
Pricing
Free planYesYes
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Free plan
Free
Always Free
Features
API and CLINot listed
Managed Databases
Multiple Regions
Object Storage
Uptime SLA
Serverless Functions
Managed Kubernetes
VPS HostingNot listed
Cloud Compute
Content Delivery Network
DDoS ProtectionNot listed

Which One Should You Choose?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) logo
Why choose Amazon Web Services (AWS)

  • Higher Integration score (10/10 vs 8/10)
  • Higher Customization score (10/10 vs 9/10)

Google Cloud logo
Why choose Google Cloud

  • Higher Analytics score (9/10 vs 8/10)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (5/10 vs 4/10)

Pros & Cons

Amazon Web Services (AWS) logo
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Pros

  • The service catalogue is unusually broad, with over 200 services across 38 regions, so most infrastructure needs can be met on one platform.
  • EC2 has a 99.99% region-level SLA with credits of up to 100%, and instances unavailable for more than six minutes in an hour are not billed for that hour.
  • The free plan gives up to $200 in credits, and more than 30 always-free services let new teams experiment at low cost.
  • Support scales from a $29 minimum up to dedicated Enterprise and Unified Operations tiers for mission-critical workloads.
  • G2 rates it 4.4 across more than 17,000 reviews, and reviewers praise its scalability and global reach.

Cons

  • Reviewers widely cite a steep learning curve across the console and services.
  • Usage pricing is complex and can produce unexpected bills unless spend is monitored closely.
  • Paid support is billed as a percentage of total AWS spend, so support costs rise with usage.
  • A July 2025 billing console bug showed customers estimated charges in the billions, which hurt trust in its cost tooling.

Google Cloud logo
Google Cloud

Pros

  • Very broad managed catalogue that spans VMs, GKE, serverless, several database engines, a CDN and Cloud Armor, so most infrastructure can come from one vendor.
  • Global footprint, which Wikipedia put at 40 regions and 121 zones in early 2024, helps teams deploy close to users and across zones.
  • A 300 USD, 90-day credit plus a permanent Always Free tier, including a small VM, lets developers prototype at no cost.
  • Capterra reviewers credit its scalability with helping them adapt quickly to changing client demand.

Cons

  • Capterra reviewers repeatedly say the billing is complex, hard to audit and sometimes produces unexpected charges.
  • Technical support requires a paid plan priced as a percentage of spend, and Premium starts at 15,000 USD a month.
  • Reviewers report a steep learning curve and inconsistent documentation.
  • The free e2-micro VM is limited to three US regions, so other regions incur standard charges.

Not sold on either?

Related Comparisons