Amazon CloudFront vs SiteGround Comparison
Compare Amazon CloudFront vs SiteGround features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon CloudFront
7.9/10
Amazon CloudFront is the AWS content delivery network. It caches and serves websites, APIs and media from more than 750 edge locations, and includes DDoS protection, WAF and edge compute.

SiteGround
6.3/10
Bulgarian web host running on Google Cloud. It offers shared, managed WordPress, WooCommerce and cloud hosting for small businesses, freelancers and agencies.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | A Amazon CloudFront | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.9/10 | 6.3/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Integration | 9/10 | 4/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $15/mo Pro (flat-rate) | €80/mo Cloud Jump Start |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free (flat-rate) | €80/mo Cloud Jump Start |
| Features | ||
| Managed WordPress | ||
| Shared Hosting | ||
| Content Delivery Network | ||
| DDoS Protection | ||
| Free SSL Certificates | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| API and CLI | Not listed | |
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Git Deployments | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
Amazon CloudFront vs SiteGround cost by team size
| Team size | Amazon CloudFront | SiteGround |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree (flat-rate) | €80/moCloud Jump Start |
| 5 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | €80/moCloud Jump Start |
| 10 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | €80/moCloud Jump Start |
| 25 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | €80/moCloud Jump Start |
| 50 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | €80/moCloud Jump Start |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
AWhy choose Amazon CloudFront
- Has a free plan (SiteGround does not)
- Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Scalability score (10/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose SiteGround

- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for small business (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Includes Managed WordPress, which Amazon CloudFront lacks
- Includes Shared Hosting, which Amazon CloudFront lacks
Pros & Cons
AAmazon CloudFront
Pros
- The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
- Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
- Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
- It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
- Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.
Cons
- G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
- Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
- Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
- Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
- Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.
SiteGround

Pros
- Every shared plan includes a custom WAF, AI anti-bot protection, malware scanning and daily off-site backups kept for 30 days.
- It runs on Google Cloud, with data centers in the US, Europe, Singapore and Sydney.
- GoGeek and the cloud plans include white-label client access and staging with Git, which helps agencies manage client sites.
- Reviewers on G2 and review sites regularly praise its support and uptime.
- Free site migrations and managed WordPress updates are included on all plans.
Cons
- Promotional first-year prices renew at roughly six to eight times the intro rate.
- The intro shared-hosting prices require paying 12 months upfront.
- The entry StartUp plan allows one site and 10 GB of storage, which a growing site can quickly outgrow.
- There is no documented public infrastructure API for developer teams.
- Some G2 users find the dashboard structure confusing.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon CloudFront scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 6.3/10 for SiteGround. The largest gap is in Integration: 9/10 for Amazon CloudFront and 4/10 for SiteGround.
Amazon CloudFront has a free plan; SiteGround does not list one.
Amazon CloudFront is the better fit for developers: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 5/10 for SiteGround.
SiteGround has Managed WordPress and Shared Hosting, which Amazon CloudFront lacks.





