Amazon CloudFront vs Modal Comparison
Compare Amazon CloudFront vs Modal features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon CloudFront
7.9/10
Amazon CloudFront is the AWS content delivery network. It caches and serves websites, APIs and media from more than 750 edge locations, and includes DDoS protection, WAF and edge compute.

Modal
6.8/10
Modal is a serverless cloud platform that runs Python code on GPUs and CPUs with per-second billing, aimed at teams building and serving AI applications.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | A Amazon CloudFront | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.9/10 | 6.8/10 |
| Integration | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | $15/mo Pro (flat-rate) | $250/mo Team |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free (flat-rate) | $250/mo Team |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Serverless Functions | ||
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | ||
| Free SSL Certificates | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | ||
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | ||
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
Amazon CloudFront vs Modal cost by team size
Amazon CloudFront and Modal cost the same at 1 user; Amazon CloudFront costs less from 5 users.
| Team size | Amazon CloudFront | Modal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree (flat-rate) | FreeStarter |
| 5 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $250/moTeam |
| 10 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $250/moTeam |
| 25 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $250/moTeam |
| 50 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $250/moTeam |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
AWhy choose Amazon CloudFront
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $250/mo
- Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Modal

- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for startups (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
AAmazon CloudFront
Pros
- The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
- Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
- Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
- It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
- Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.
Cons
- G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
- Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
- Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
- Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
- Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.
Modal

Pros
- GPUs from the T4 up to the B300 are available without quota requests or reservations, and workloads can burst to thousands of containers.
- Per-second billing and scale-to-zero mean idle bursty inference workloads cost nothing.
- Python developers define infrastructure in code and deploy with a single CLI command, with no Kubernetes or Dockerfiles needed.
- The free Starter plan includes $30 a month of compute, and startup and academic credit programs are available.
- Sandboxes support large numbers of concurrent isolated environments for AI agents and untrusted code.
Cons
- Always-on or steady workloads can cost more than reserved GPU rentals from providers such as RunPod or Lambda.
- Containers stay billable for 60 seconds after the last request by default, and keep-warm settings are a common source of bill surprises.
- Region pinning raises prices by 1.15 to 1.75 times, and non-preemptible execution by 3 times.
- SSO, audit logs, and HIPAA support are limited to the custom-priced Enterprise plan.
- Credits from AWS, GCP, or Azure cannot be applied to Modal usage.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon CloudFront scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 6.8/10 for Modal. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 5/10 for Amazon CloudFront and 8/10 for Modal.
Amazon CloudFront costs less for 10 users: free on its Free (flat-rate) plan, against about $250/mo on its Team plan for Modal, billed monthly.
Yes, both Amazon CloudFront and Modal have a free plan.
Modal is the better fit for startups: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for Amazon CloudFront.





