b stack radar

Amazon CloudFront vs Latitude.sh Comparison

Compare Amazon CloudFront vs Latitude.sh features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

A

Amazon CloudFront

7.9/10

Winner

Amazon CloudFront is the AWS content delivery network. It caches and serves websites, APIs and media from more than 750 edge locations, and includes DDoS protection, WAF and edge compute.

Latitude.sh logo

Latitude.sh

6.9/10

Bare metal cloud provider that offers dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual machines on demand, billed hourly or monthly, for developers and infrastructure-heavy businesses.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
A
Amazon CloudFront
Latitude.sh logo
Latitude.sh
Scores
Overall Rating7.9/106.9/10
Integration9/107/10
Support6/107/10
Cost6/106/10
Customization9/108/10
Security9/107/10
Reliability9/107/10
Ease of Use5/106/10
Analytics7/105/10
Scalability10/108/10
Pricing
Free planYesNo
Cheapest paid plan$15/mo
Pro (flat-rate)
$18/mo
Virtual Machine vm.micro
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Free (flat-rate)
$18/mo
Virtual Machine vm.micro
Features
Dedicated Servers
API and CLI
DDoS Protection
Multiple Regions
Cloud ComputeNot listed
Content Delivery NetworkNot listed
Free SSL CertificatesNot listed
Managed KubernetesNot listed
Managed WordPressNot listed
Serverless FunctionsNot listed
Shared HostingNot listed
Uptime SLANot listed
VPS HostingNot listed

Amazon CloudFront vs Latitude.sh cost by team size

Amazon CloudFront costs less at every team size we checked.

Team sizeAmazon CloudFrontLatitude.sh
1 userFreeFree (flat-rate)$18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro
5 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)$18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro
10 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)$18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro
25 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)$18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro
50 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)$18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

A
Why choose Amazon CloudFront

  • Has a free plan (Latitude.sh does not)
  • Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $18/mo
  • Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Higher Security score (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 3/10)

Latitude.sh logo
Why choose Latitude.sh

  • Higher Support score (7/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)
  • Includes Dedicated Servers, which Amazon CloudFront lacks

Pros & Cons

A
Amazon CloudFront

Pros

  • The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
  • Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
  • Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
  • It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
  • Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.

Cons

  • G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
  • Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
  • Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
  • Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
  • Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.

Latitude.sh logo
Latitude.sh

Pros

  • Prices for every metal, GPU and VM plan are listed publicly, with hourly rates as well as monthly ones.
  • Each listed plan includes 20 TB of outbound bandwidth, and inbound traffic is unlimited.
  • Servers are offered in 26 locations, including several in Latin America such as Sao Paulo, Bogota, Santiago, Buenos Aires and Mexico City.
  • Servers can be automated through the API, SDKs, CLI and a Terraform provider.
  • Current-generation AMD EPYC hardware runs alongside B300, RTX PRO 6000 and H100 GPU options.

Cons

  • There is no managed WordPress, managed database or serverless offering, so you need operations expertise.
  • Independent user reviews are scarce, and PeerSpot shows no reviews at all.
  • Bandwidth overage rates and storage prices are not shown on the main pricing page.
  • The Megaport acquisition may change the roadmap over time, although Latitude.sh says the brand and billing stay the same.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Amazon CloudFront scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 6.9/10 for Latitude.sh. The largest gap is in Analytics: 7/10 for Amazon CloudFront and 5/10 for Latitude.sh.

Amazon CloudFront costs less for 10 users: free on its Free (flat-rate) plan, against about $18/mo on its Virtual Machine vm.micro plan for Latitude.sh, billed monthly.

Amazon CloudFront has a free plan; Latitude.sh does not list one.

Amazon CloudFront is the better fit for small business: we rate it 5/10 for them, against 3/10 for Latitude.sh.

Latitude.sh has Dedicated Servers, which Amazon CloudFront lacks.

Related Comparisons