Agisoft Metashape vs Propeller Comparison
Compare Agisoft Metashape vs Propeller features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Agisoft Metashape
6.3/10
Desktop photogrammetry software that turns drone, aerial and close-range photos into point clouds, meshes, DEMs and orthomosaics for surveying and mapping.
Propeller
6.8/10
Propeller is a cloud 3D mapping and survey analytics platform. It turns drone and GNSS data into measurable site models for earthworks, construction, mining and aggregates teams.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.3/10 | 6.8/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 4/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Drone Inspection | ||
| LiDAR Processing | ||
| Digital Twin | Not listed | |
| Document Control | Not listed | |
| Engineering Design | Not listed | |
| GIS and Mapping | Not listed | |
| Inspection Automation | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Agisoft Metashape
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for drone service providers (9/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for engineering firms (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Propeller
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for construction (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Agisoft Metashape
Pros
- Perpetual licenses avoid subscriptions: Standard is $179 and Professional is $3,499 as a one-time cost.
- Reviewers praise the quality of its DEMs and orthomosaics.
- The Python and Java API allows automated, customized processing pipelines.
- Network processing spreads large projects across multiple local nodes.
- Runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.
- Moving from PhotoScan to Metashape was free, and Standard licenses can be upgraded.
Cons
- Users report long processing times and difficult troubleshooting.
- Automatic GCP target detection sometimes fails.
- Some users find textures messier than in competing tools.
- There are no asset management, work order or inspection reporting workflows.
- The online store currently accepts only wire transfer, ACH or SEPA.
- Support is mainly email and forum based.
Propeller
Pros
- Combines drone, LiDAR, GNSS rover and total station data on a single map, regardless of which hardware captured it.
- AeroPoints give survey-grade ground control without the manual surveying normally needed to set control points.
- Strong stockpile, cut and fill, and progress tooling, with a long track record in earthworks and aggregates.
- Integrates with common construction systems such as Procore, Trimble Connect, Autodesk Build and HCSS.
- The trust center shows a SOC 2 Type 2 attestation.
Cons
- No published software pricing, so buyers have to request a quote.
- Hardware such as AeroPoints and DirtMate adds separate costs on top of the software.
- Reviewers find less depth for vertical construction and interior fitout work.
- Some reviewers say the price may seem high to smaller clients.
Not sold on either?
Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Propeller scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.3/10 for Agisoft Metashape. The largest gap is in Cost: 8/10 for Agisoft Metashape and 4/10 for Propeller.
No, neither Agisoft Metashape nor Propeller lists a free plan.
Propeller is the better fit for construction: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for Agisoft Metashape.
